2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Genetic Structure in a Nonequilibrium Metapopulation of the Plant Silene latifolia

Abstract: Population genetic differentiation will be influenced by the demographic history of populations, opportunities for migration among neighboring demes and founder effects associated with repeated extinction and recolonization. In natural populations, these factors are expected to interact with each other and their magnitudes will vary depending on the spatial distribution and age structure of local demes. Although each of these effects has been individually identified as important in structuring genetic variance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After accounting for extrinsic factors and genetic drift, A. chrysogaster , G. nigra , A. natalis and M. dolomieu had substantial unexplained variation in pairwise F ST , suggesting network geometry plays a reduced role in shaping spatial genetic variation for these species. Nonequilibrium population processes such as extirpation and recolonization dynamics (Fields & Taylor ) or ecological disturbances (Banks et al . ) can influence patterns of genetic variation and might lead to genetic differentiation patterns unrelated to network architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After accounting for extrinsic factors and genetic drift, A. chrysogaster , G. nigra , A. natalis and M. dolomieu had substantial unexplained variation in pairwise F ST , suggesting network geometry plays a reduced role in shaping spatial genetic variation for these species. Nonequilibrium population processes such as extirpation and recolonization dynamics (Fields & Taylor ) or ecological disturbances (Banks et al . ) can influence patterns of genetic variation and might lead to genetic differentiation patterns unrelated to network architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such increased gene flow is particularly important within a metapopulation context, because the negative demographic and genetic consequences of small population size and local extinction can be mitigated by connectivity with other populations in the region [15,23,24]. Under this model, gene flow shares diversity among populations so the metapopulation as a whole maintains higher N e and sustains the invasion even if individual invasive populations are small.…”
Section: (A) Genetic Variation and Response To Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population genetic models that assign source populations to colonists and test for genetic associations between source population characteristics (e.g. density, inbreeding rate and phenotypes) and colonization probability may be a particularly useful approach for investigating the effect of metapopulation context on population persistence [24,26].…”
Section: (A) Genetic Variation and Response To Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the founding population represents only a part of the source population, it most likely will be genetically differentiated from the source at emergence. For example, riparian populations of oregano ( Origanum vulgare ; Van Looy, Jacquemyn, Breyne, & Honnay, ) and roadside populations of white campion ( Silene latifolia ; Fields & Taylor, ) display strong genetic differentiation between populations due to founder effects. A small founding population also has a small effective population size, which combined with genetic drift can lead to further genetic differentiation between newly founded populations and their source population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%