2016
DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness in a Physical Activity Program for Church-Going Latinas

Abstract: Faith-based interventions show promise for reducing health disparities among ethnic minority populations. However, churches vary significantly in their readiness and willingness to support these programs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with priests, other church leaders, and lay health advisors in churches implementing a physical activity intervention targeting Latinas. Implementation effectiveness was operationalized as average 6-month participation rates in physical activity classes at each church… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Midway through the implementation of Faith in Action, we collected data examining implementation outcomes of a subset of churches participating in the PA intervention. 38 The findings suggest that pastor support, innovation-values fit, and resource availability were factors that impacted implementation effectiveness (average 6-month participation rates in PA classes at each church). In addition, churches with lower parishioner engagement had low support from church staff and leaders, while churches with higher parishioner engagement reported high pastor support, high innovation-values fit, medium to high recourse availability, and medium to high parishioner engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 Midway through the implementation of Faith in Action, we collected data examining implementation outcomes of a subset of churches participating in the PA intervention. 38 The findings suggest that pastor support, innovation-values fit, and resource availability were factors that impacted implementation effectiveness (average 6-month participation rates in PA classes at each church). In addition, churches with lower parishioner engagement had low support from church staff and leaders, while churches with higher parishioner engagement reported high pastor support, high innovation-values fit, medium to high recourse availability, and medium to high parishioner engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, churches with lower parishioner engagement had low support from church staff and leaders, while churches with higher parishioner engagement reported high pastor support, high innovation-values fit, medium to high recourse availability, and medium to high parishioner engagement. 38 While these findings shed light on the organizational-level factors affecting implementation of Faith in Action, more targeted studies are needed to identify determinants that impact implementation and implementation strategies that target these determinants among a broader range of religious denominations for wider scale-up and dissemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Midway through the implementation of Faith in Action, we collected data examining implementation outcomes of a subset of churches participating in the physical activity intervention. 28 The findings suggest that pastor support, innovation-values fit, and resource availability were factors that impacted implementation effectiveness (average 6-month participation rates in PA classes at each church). In addition, churches with lower parishioner engagement had low support from church staff and leaders while churches with higher parishioner engagement reported high pastor support, high innovation-values fit, medium to high recourse availability, and medium to high parishioner engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, churches with lower parishioner engagement had low support from church staff and leaders while churches with higher parishioner engagement reported high pastor support, high innovation-values fit, medium to high recourse availability, and medium to high parishioner engagement. 28 While these findings shed light on the organizational-level factors affecting implementation of Faith in Action, more targeted studies are needed identify determinants that impact implementation and implementation strategies that target these determinants among a wider range of religious denominations for wider scale-up and dissemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we examined three factors related to faith organizational implementation readiness [21]. These were: "leadership engagement," including championing of Faith and Diabetes activities by ministers and other faith organization administrators [30,31]; "available resources" for DSME implementation, including money, time, facility space, and training and ongoing coaching [31][32][33]; and "other activities" complementing or competing with Faith and Diabetes as a relative priority within faith organizations [34]. For instance, participants in prior peer-led DSME have reported missing classes because of competing work and domestic obligations [35,36].…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%