2007
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of male sexual function in inflammatory bowel disease: A survey-based cross-sectional analysis in 280 men

Abstract: Sexual function was relatively better with longer disease duration and was not affected by the long-term severity of the disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
82
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] This study revealed that physicians infrequently addressed issues relating to sexual function. Increasing physicians' sensitivity and awareness of sexual concerns and the potential for sexual dysfunction in IBD patients is essential.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[1][2][3] This study revealed that physicians infrequently addressed issues relating to sexual function. Increasing physicians' sensitivity and awareness of sexual concerns and the potential for sexual dysfunction in IBD patients is essential.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Final number of studies included: n=14 8 On the other hand, depression was also the most consistent predictor factor for low sexual function among females in Timmer et al 2008. 9 Other predictors were frequent relapses and anxiety [intercourse frequency domain OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-4.7 and OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1-3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the International Index for Erectile Function [IIEF] for males and the Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI] for femaleswere used in the majority of the studies. 7,8,11,13,14,15,16,17,19,20 The majority of the studies examined sexual function in both males and females and thus the results are not presented based on sex. Instead the results are presented based on participant selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations