2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.265009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
498
5
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 740 publications
(539 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
29
498
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first finding is similar in spirit to a large literature in finance, which reports negative market reaction to a wide array of corporate changes. For example, Palmrose (2004) find that the market reaction to earnings restatements, even ones that appear to improve transparency, is uniformly negative [1], and Graham (2008) find that the reaction of the bond market to earning restatements is always negative [2]. Thus, similar to what we document, the market seems to be skeptical of any alteration to previously provided information.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our first finding is similar in spirit to a large literature in finance, which reports negative market reaction to a wide array of corporate changes. For example, Palmrose (2004) find that the market reaction to earnings restatements, even ones that appear to improve transparency, is uniformly negative [1], and Graham (2008) find that the reaction of the bond market to earning restatements is always negative [2]. Thus, similar to what we document, the market seems to be skeptical of any alteration to previously provided information.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Palmrose. (2004) find that the market reaction to earnings restatements, even ones that appear to improve transparency, is uniformly negative [1], and Graham. (2008) find that the reaction of the bond market to earning restatements is always negative [2].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have found that there is a significant negative market response to the announcement of financial restatements (Feroz, Park, and Pastena, 1991;Owers, Lin, and Rogers, 2002;Palmrose, Richardson, and Scholz, 2004). In addition, prior research has shown that restatements can damage the reputations of the firm's top executives and board members.…”
Section: Ceo and Prior Financial Restatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies show that the disclosures of earnings restatement are related to large market value losses. For example, Palmrose, Richardson, and Scholz (2004) report a -9.2% of market return loss over a two-day (0,1) of restatement announcement period, and Hribar and Jenkins (2004) find that the cost of capital rises after restatements. Moreover, Gleason et al (2008) explore the industry contagion effect of earning restatements from the investor's perspective, and find that when a firm restates, the peer firms in the same industry also experience stock price declines.…”
Section: Prior Research and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%