2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of masticatory performance assessed by mixing ability tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller the particles size, the better the masticatory performance. The colorimetric technique is based on the mixing degree of a 2-color material (usually color-changeable gum or paraffin wax), determined by visual matching with color scales [ 23 ] or digital analysis with a software program [ 24 , 25 ]. Both procedures seemed equal regarding test reliability [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the particles size, the better the masticatory performance. The colorimetric technique is based on the mixing degree of a 2-color material (usually color-changeable gum or paraffin wax), determined by visual matching with color scales [ 23 ] or digital analysis with a software program [ 24 , 25 ]. Both procedures seemed equal regarding test reliability [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we did not assess participants’ salivary flow rate or determine whether they had Sjogren's syndrome. However, in a previous study, 29 salivary flow was not a significant predictor of masticatory performance assessed with two‐coloured chewing gum. Similarly, in another previous investigation, 27 individuals with higher salivary flow rates did not have higher swallowing thresholds in a test performed with peanuts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, from the present results, we could not find a significant difference in protein intake between those with ≥20 and 10–19 remaining teeth in the absence of a dental prosthesis. In addition, a previous study revealed that the number of occlusal units was strongly associated with chewing efficiency 27 . Therefore, it is considered that, for those with 10–19 remaining teeth, a certain number of premolar and molar teeth remained, occlusal units were preserved and chewing efficiency did not greatly differ from that of individuals with ≥20 remaining teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%