2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00023-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

35
358
9
37

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
35
358
9
37
Order By: Relevance
“…4,9,12 These differences may be related to anatomical or physiological differences among study populations. 3,4 They are not likely related to differences in material properties because the Shore A hardness value of OC is lower than those of previous versions of this material. However, this last presents slightly higher compression strain than OC (www.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4,9,12 These differences may be related to anatomical or physiological differences among study populations. 3,4 They are not likely related to differences in material properties because the Shore A hardness value of OC is lower than those of previous versions of this material. However, this last presents slightly higher compression strain than OC (www.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Lujan-Climent et al 4 reported an ICC of 0.97 and minimum detectable difference of 0.4 mm for X 50 values obtained from nine dentate subjects who chewed three-quarters of Optosil P Plus ® tablets (5-mm thickness, 20-mm diameter) in five time trials. Using peanuts and the single sieve method, Hatch et al 3 obtained an ICC of 0.78 for inter-examiner reliability of MPI-2 mm values. Edlund and Lamm 10 controlled the double sieve method by averaging 10 successive repeated measurements obtained from four subjects performing four trials at 3-day intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations