2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Physicians' Attitudes Toward the Management of Infectious Diseases in Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One survey study found that many doctors who provide palliative care tend to initiate and maintain or extend antibiotics use in EOL patients, even in cases where antibiotics might not be appropriate or where the risks might outweigh the benefits [ 4 ]. Another study found that physicians have divergent attitudes toward the management of infectious diseases in terminally ill patients with cancer [ 29 ]. Our survey reveals a significant lack of awareness about ASP among internal medicine residents and specialists, and that doctors found it difficult to use antibiotics appropriately in EOL patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One survey study found that many doctors who provide palliative care tend to initiate and maintain or extend antibiotics use in EOL patients, even in cases where antibiotics might not be appropriate or where the risks might outweigh the benefits [ 4 ]. Another study found that physicians have divergent attitudes toward the management of infectious diseases in terminally ill patients with cancer [ 29 ]. Our survey reveals a significant lack of awareness about ASP among internal medicine residents and specialists, and that doctors found it difficult to use antibiotics appropriately in EOL patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Predictors of EOL antimicrobial use are multifactorial and may include: insufficient prescriber knowledge of benefits and risks, a desire to respect patient or surrogate decisions, and beliefs that antimicrobials are less invasive than other therapies or that they palliate symptoms. [11][12][13] To our knowledge, there is no high-level evidence to support antimicrobial use for relief of distressing symptoms, with the exception of pain secondary to urinary tract infection at EOL (prescriptive use poorly defined). 3,4,[14][15][16] Furthermore, when a patient's prognosis is estimated as weeks-to-months, there is little data to support survival benefits, 5,17 and conversely, continued use for those imminently dying may hasten death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%