1996
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00100-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
174
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
174
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this paradigm, the topic of relationship quality has stimulated a profuse production of scientific publications. Although previous literature has measured relationship quality between service firms and their customers (e.g., Roberts, Varki and Brodie, 2003), manufacturers/suppliers and distributors/resellers (e.g., Dorsch, Swanson, and Kelley, 1998;Kumar, Scheer and Steenkamp, 1995) and between salespeople and customers (e.g., Bejou, Wray, and Ingram, 1996), there is no tested scale by which exporting firms can measure the quality of their relationship with importing firms. Indeed, as Samiee and Walters (2003: 194) state, in an international business context, "the rate of conceptual development of new frameworks has tended to go faster than empirical testing and, not surprisingly, hard data on many aspects of relationship marketing is still lacking".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this paradigm, the topic of relationship quality has stimulated a profuse production of scientific publications. Although previous literature has measured relationship quality between service firms and their customers (e.g., Roberts, Varki and Brodie, 2003), manufacturers/suppliers and distributors/resellers (e.g., Dorsch, Swanson, and Kelley, 1998;Kumar, Scheer and Steenkamp, 1995) and between salespeople and customers (e.g., Bejou, Wray, and Ingram, 1996), there is no tested scale by which exporting firms can measure the quality of their relationship with importing firms. Indeed, as Samiee and Walters (2003: 194) state, in an international business context, "the rate of conceptual development of new frameworks has tended to go faster than empirical testing and, not surprisingly, hard data on many aspects of relationship marketing is still lacking".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closeness also corresponds well with the notion of guanxi differentiation discussed earlier. Although the social network researchers usually measure the strength of social ties by the frequency of interactions, or stability (duration) (for a summary, see Brass, 1995), and the social psychologists usually include trust, satisfaction with, and commitment to, a relationship to measure the quality of a relationship (e.g., Bejou, Wray and Ingram, 1996;Berscheid, Snyder and Omoto, 1989b;Crosby, Evans and Cowles, 1990;Smith, 1998a), we approach this psychological construct with a simpler and more straightforward measure. Due to the ego-centered nature of the Chinese guanxi network (Fei, 1992), we suggest that guanxi quality be assessed by the distance between where the guanxi partner located in the psychological guanxi net space and the center in which the self is located.…”
Section: An Integrated Conception Of Guanximentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years many researchers working in the marketing ®eld have found neural networks (NNs) useful in analysing and forecasting customer behaviour, and in market segmentation (see eg Poopalasingam and Nellis, 1996;Mazanec, 1993;Dasqupta et al, 1994;Davies et al, 1996;Bejou et al, 1996). NNs have been found to offer various advantages over more traditional statistical methods such as regression.…”
Section: The Research Model Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%