Determinants of rural livelihood interventions: an ISM-MICMAC approach

Abstract

Purpose Livelihood interventions are recognized as instruments to deliver sustainable development by addressing multidimensional issues of poverty. Despite several interventions, success still remains trivial due to various interactive determinants. The purpose of this paper is to present the hierarchical model of determinants of rural livelihood interventions in India. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach to explore the interactive relationships among determinants. Then, by using the Matrice d’ Impacts Croises - Multipication Applique a classement (MICMAC) approach, these determinants are classified into four groups on the basis of their driving power and dependence power. Findings The research findings include identification of nine critical determinants using hybrid research process. These nine determinants are classified into four distinct levels revealing different extents of influence on livelihood outcomes. The results show that strong emphasis should be given to local institutions and enclosing institutional environment in terms of good governance and better convergence. Practical implications The research findings offer insights for policy-makers on the hierarchical model among determinants. The study will help to close the existing dominant gap between theory and practice and imply corresponding methods and processes to deliver better livelihood outcomes. Originality/value This study contributes to policy literature by providing a structural model for interventions. This model identifies the dominant as well as mediating determinants and thereby guides policymakers to develop corresponding instruments and strategies. The study also contributes to rural development literature by identifying various interactive contextual relationships and thereby classifying the high priority determinants.

Rural Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Current and Emerging Issues from the Sustainable Livelihood Framework

“…Likewise, the incidence of poverty could be reduced through innovation platforms for smallholder farmers (Brown et al 2021), the participation of NGOs (Amofah et al 2021), and the stimulation of endogenous power of rural households to generate positive livelihood acceleration (Deng et al 2020), and the combination of land system reform and policy innovation to provide a rural land consolidation (Wang et al 2021). Similarly, considering variables that affect the sustainable development of rural livelihoods is required, such as participatory approach, socio-cultural space, process sustainability, rural infrastructure, access to public services, local institutions, convergence, targeting of poor, and governance (Kumar et al 2020).…”

“…The governance and institution interrelation is related to the interactions between the entrepreneur and the environment (Deng et al 2020), the convergence of local institutions and an enclosing institutional environment (Kumar et al 2020), and horizontal and vertical relationships (Lang and Fink 2019). Then, formal and informal institutions should be considered in the analysis (Escandón-Barbosa et al 2019), as well as policies and government interventions (Otoijamun et al 2021).…”

Analysis of drivers for anti-food waste behaviour - TISM and MICMAC approach

“…Reachability matrix is used to drive dependence power and driving power. Dependence power indicates total number of factors affecting a factor whereas driving power indicates a total number of factors a given factor affects (Kumar et al, 2020a(Kumar et al, , 2020b(Kumar et al, , 2020c(Kumar et al, , 2020d. As handling and managing the consumer food waste behaviour require driving the qualitative factors, TISM is considered the best suitable approach for this study.…”

Interventions for sustainable livelihoods: a review of evidence and knowledge gaps

“…Posed as “a way of life” (Santos, 2015, p. 287), livelihoods could be seen as an important component in the Capabilities-Functioning Framework (Sen, 1999). Livelihood is a function of complex interactions among economic, social and environmental factors (Kumar and Giri, 2020; Kumar et al ., 2019; Alobo Loison, 2015; Neves and Silva, 2014; Ellis, 2012); therefore, integrated conceptualisation of livelihoods is required to achieve the goals of sustainable development (United Nations, 2015). Conceptualisation of sustainable livelihoods (Chambers and Conway, 1992; DFID, 1997) and resulting interventions often form linkages with transformations at the grassroots (Lam et al ., 2020; Kumar et al ., 2020; Stacey et al ., 2019).…”