2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2015.067474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of service quality in education: service provider's perspective and academician's perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Managers working in the surveyed units under study also believe that they are providing good service quality to their workers. These findings are in line that of Sedmak (2016); Kamakoty and Sohani (2015); Yoo and Donthu (2001); and who compared quality management practices of Indian manufacturing organizations with those of global firms and found that Indian manufacturing units do not lag behind these industrialized countries in term of valuing long-term relationship with their supply chain stakeholders. The results are not only interesting but also are significant.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Managers working in the surveyed units under study also believe that they are providing good service quality to their workers. These findings are in line that of Sedmak (2016); Kamakoty and Sohani (2015); Yoo and Donthu (2001); and who compared quality management practices of Indian manufacturing organizations with those of global firms and found that Indian manufacturing units do not lag behind these industrialized countries in term of valuing long-term relationship with their supply chain stakeholders. The results are not only interesting but also are significant.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi, an apex body for governing technical education, indicated that approximately 45% of seats remained vacant in the 2019-2020 academic year, which was earlier noticed to be 38% in 2012-2013. Most of the studies have verified that this situation is due to problems pertaining to awareness, attraction, recognition of needs and service offers ( Kamokoty et al, 2015 ; Upadhayay & Vrat, 2017 )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para pengkaji berpendapat bahawa pelajar mungkin tidak mempunyai jangkaan yang jelas tentang perkhidmatan pendidikan tinggi (Joseph & Joseph, 1997;Ford et al, 1999;Angell et al, 2008). Idea ini telah digunakan secara meluas dalam pelbagai kajian yang bertujuan mengukur kualiti perkhidmatan institusi pendidikan (Ganguli & Roy, 2010;Ibrahim et al, 2012;Enayati et al, 2013;Abdelhak et al, 2015;Kamokoty et al, 2015;Kolar et al, 2018).…”
Section: Kualiti Institusi Pendidikanunclassified