2013
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2012.682986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Stated Son Preference in India: Are Men and Women Different?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…xvii For education, see Chung and Das Gupta (2007), Koolwal (2007), Pande and Astone (2007), Robitaille (2013), Yount (2005. For media exposure, see Pande and Astone (2007) and Robitaille (2013). xviii While this paper focuses on mothers-in-law's influence, there is no doubt that husbands are also important decision makers.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…xvii For education, see Chung and Das Gupta (2007), Koolwal (2007), Pande and Astone (2007), Robitaille (2013), Yount (2005. For media exposure, see Pande and Astone (2007) and Robitaille (2013). xviii While this paper focuses on mothers-in-law's influence, there is no doubt that husbands are also important decision makers.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xvi In contrast, Pande and Astone (2007) conclude that Muslim women have higher son preference than Hindu women but that women who are of another faith than Hinduism or Islam have lower son preference than Hindu women. xvii For education, see Chung and Das Gupta (2007), Koolwal (2007), Pande and Astone (2007), Robitaille (2013), Yount (2005. For media exposure, see Pande and Astone (2007) and Robitaille (2013).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, in patrilineal inheritance systems all familial inheritance is transferred to male heirs (ibid). Patrilocal-patrilineal norms reinforce preference for sons because families do not expect to benefit from investing in daughters who will leave the natal home upon marriage (Das Gupta et al 2003;Robitaille 2013), while sons are expected to provide financial assistance to aging parents and to pass family property on to the next generation (Das Gupta et al 2003). Empirical evidence suggests that patrilocal kinship systems are associated with lower rates of female child survival (Kishor 1993;Dyson and Moore 1983).…”
Section: Sociocultural and Economic Drivers Of Son Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only statistics for the first four are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Women residing with their in-laws may face more pressure to sex select [Robitaille (2013)], although this is not apparent in the descriptive statistics. In Table 2, second-born females are more likely to have a mother that is the household head.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%