Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol

Abstract

BackgroundClinical networks are increasingly being viewed as an important strategy for increasing evidence-based practice and improving models of care, but success is variable and characteristics of networks with high impact are uncertain. This study takes advantage of the variability in the functioning and outcomes of networks supported by the Australian New South Wales (NSW) Agency for Clinical Innovation's non-mandatory model of clinical networks to investigate the factors that contribute to the success of clinical networks.Methods/DesignThe objective of this retrospective study is to examine the association between external support, organisational and program factors, and indicators of success among 19 clinical networks over a three-year period (2006-2008). The outcomes (health impact, system impact, programs implemented, engagement, user perception, and financial leverage) and explanatory factors will be collected using a web-based survey, interviews, and record review. An independent expert panel will provide judgements about the impact or extent of each network's initiatives on health and system impacts. The ratings of the expert panel will be the outcome used in multivariable analyses. Following the rating of network success, a qualitative study will be conducted to provide a more in-depth examination of the most successful networks.DiscussionThis is the first study to combine quantitative and qualitative methods to examine the factors that contribute to the success of clinical networks and, more generally, is the largest study of clinical networks undertaken. The adaptation of expert panel methods to rate the impacts of networks is the methodological innovation of this study. The proposed project will identify the conditions that should be established or encouraged by agencies developing clinical networks and will be of immediate use in forming strategies and programs to maximise the effectiveness of such networks.

Designing a theory-informed, contextually appropriate intervention strategy to improve delivery of paediatric services in Kenyan hospitals

“…This network structure will aim ‘to improve clinical care and service delivery using a collegial approach to identify and implement strategies’ (adapted from Haines 2012 et al [47]). It will work as a partner to government and align itself formally with the Kenya Paediatric Association.…”

Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000–2006

“…Our approach was adapted from the RAND/UCLA (University of California, LA, USA) appropriateness method [21,22]. This systematic consensus method has been widely used to derive expert consensus on clinical indications, quality improvement and assessing effectiveness of health networks [23,24]. …”

Identifying the processes of change and engagement from using a social network intervention for people with long‐term conditions. A qualitative study

“…There is a recognition that providing person‐centred care and understanding what people with long‐term conditions value in relation to self‐management requires exploring the contexts and ways in which social ties and resources shape everyday interactions and mechanisms through which changes in existing practice are negotiated . Social network interventions designed to mobilize resources have to compete alongside pre‐existing practices and manage interactions between people and their contexts to ensure the acceptability, workability and integration of new ways of doing things in everyday life …”