Abstract:In order to optimize cost-effectiveness, the level of effectiveness required to treat the specific patient or patient group must be considered. Statin efficacy is the major determinant of cost-effectiveness when greater cholesterol lowering is required, i.e., for high-risk patients, who make up the primary target group. Statin price is the more important factor if only limited cholesterol lowering (e.g., 35% or less reduction in LDL) is required.
“…19 However, our study found that almost two-thirds of participants who were at high risk for developing CHD within 10 years and who were eligible for lipid-lowering drugs were not receiving medication. Our estimates would be even higher had we used the modification of the LDL-C goal for high-risk patients of less than 70 mg/dL recommended by the updated 2004 NCEP ATP III report.…”
Context Studies show that a large proportion of adults with high levels of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remain untreated or undertreated despite growing use of lipid-lowering medications.
“…19 However, our study found that almost two-thirds of participants who were at high risk for developing CHD within 10 years and who were eligible for lipid-lowering drugs were not receiving medication. Our estimates would be even higher had we used the modification of the LDL-C goal for high-risk patients of less than 70 mg/dL recommended by the updated 2004 NCEP ATP III report.…”
Context Studies show that a large proportion of adults with high levels of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remain untreated or undertreated despite growing use of lipid-lowering medications.
“…22 Because the majority of hyperlipidemia patients do not have existing cardiovascular disease, we base our analysis of the costeffectiveness of DTCA on the efficacy of statins for primary prevention. The efficacy of statins for secondary prevention has been shown to be larger than that for primary prevention (Morrison & Glassberg, 2003). Our estimate of effectiveness of DTCA is therefore conservative.…”
“…20 The market introduction of rosuvastatin in late 2003 increased the attention to ever more powerful statins and the relative cost-effectiveness among these drugs. 21 Yet, managed care pharmacists should not lose sight of the cost per outcome in disease management of coronary heart disease (CHD). For example, comparison of 5 alternative prevention strategies in a patient at 10% coronary risk over 5 years showed that aspirin 75 mg per day is the most cost effective at £3,500 (British) pounds per CHD event prevented; 72% lower cost compared with initial treatment for hypertension with a diuretic (bendrofluazide 2.5 mg per day) and beta-blocker (50 mg atenolol per day; 12,500 pounds); 81% lower cost compared with the £18,300 for the initial thiazide + beta-blocker combination + enalapril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) 20 mg per day; 94% lower cost than the £60,000 for clopidogrel 75 mg per day or the £61,400 for simvastatin 40 mg per day.…”
Section: Methods To Attain Optimal Outcomes With Lipid-lowering Drmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.