Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces sa ri ly repre sent the opi ni on of the ZEW.M &A and the Tax Benets of Debt-Financing *
Uwe ScheueringCentre for European Economic Research (ZEW) †
March 2014Abstract:The deductibility of interest expenses from the corporate tax base creates an incentive for acquiring companies to nance a takeover with debt. In this paper, I investigate the impact of prot taxation on the nancing decision in corporate acquisitions for the rst time for a sample of dierent acquirer-countries mainly in Europe. The likelihood to observe a debt-nanced acquisition is found to increase in the acquirer's tax rate. In addition, I take into account that the nancing decisions of particular acquisitions might not be independent from other investment decisions. Therefore, I analyze the acquirer's capital structure development around the acquisition and nd an increase in the statutory tax rate by one %-point to be associated with a stronger increase in the debt ratio by 0.55 %-points during the acquisition period. Non-Technical Summary I examine the extent to which acquiring companies make use of the tax advantage of debt-nancing in the acquisition period. The intuition is that companies can reduce their tax burden by means of debt-nancing because interest expenses are deductible from the corporate tax base and therefore create a tax shield. In contrast, dividends, in a sense the interest payments to equity providers, are not deductible.The relevance of interest tax shields for acquiring companies was highlighted by the French announcement of increasing taxes and at the same time restricting the deductibility of interest expenses in 2012. Private equity rms, which often undertake mainly debtnanced acquisitions, heavily complained about this notication and even threatened to leave France.The tax advantage of debt might lead to economically inecient high debt ratios and, therefore, to higher risk of nancial distress and lower resistance to crisis. Moreover, it can make acquisitions protable, which would not occur in a world without tax discrimination of equity. Furthermore, multinational companies face tax planning opportunities when it comes to the nancing decision of corporate acquisitions due to the dierent tax systems and tax rates in the countries their subsidiaries are located in.I have analyzed the nancing decision in corporate acquisitions between 2001 and 2011 across many, mainly European countries. The empirical approach consisted of two parts. First, I examined the probability to observe a debt-nanced deal. Second, I took a look...