@ERSpublicationsWithin the current epidemiological transition, expect and find incident COPD cases anytime, anywhere http://ow.ly/UOccWThe recent European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Task Force for COPD Research statement [1] requested new studies that "…evaluate the impact of age on the importance of identifying an airflow limitation (i.e. is it more important to identify asymptomatic airflow limitation in a 30-year-old than an 80-year-old?)", as well as those studies that compare outcomes among individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the basis of the fixed ratio versus lower limit of normal (LLN) thresholds. In this issue of the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ), LUOTO et al. [2] report the results of a study that fulfils both goals.The world's population is ageing at a prodigious rate and it is anticipated the life span of newborns in the year 2000 in many Western countries might reach 100 years [3]. Ergo, the frequency of noncommunicable diseases will increase exponentially, and COPD, intrinsically associated with ageing and tobacco use/ exposure, is also expected to increase its burden, as many more people will live with it for longer. The recent Global Burden of Disease update estimated the number of people worldwide with COPD to be 328 million [4]. However, given the likely ecological fallacy [5], for a universally very high level of underdiagnosis [6], there are many questions that remain unanswered relating to the elderly with COPD. A research call for COPD in the elderly, similar to that for asthma in the elderly, is needed [7].As reviewed by LUOTO et al. [2], there were few studies quantifying the incidence of spirometrically confirmed COPD in the literature, particularly within the elderly. As exemplified in their table 5, there is a wide heterogeneity in the published estimates of incidence, varying by method, location, age and sex. Theirs is a friendly addition, given that the LLN versus fixed ratio debate appears to be more heated than ever. Within the ERJ, it is welcome that forthcoming authors report both outcomes [8]. Thus, eventually, meta-analyses based on individual patient data will help to investigate further this question and identify the more accurate of these two approaches.LUOTO et al.[2] followed for 6 years nearly a thousand individuals aged 65-100 years who had an acceptable spirometry at baseline. They participated in the longitudinal Good Aging in Skåne study, which in turn is part of the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care. Not surprisingly for an elderly population, the incidence of airflow limitation compatible with COPD was higher according to the fixed ratio definition of a forced expiratory volume in 1 s/(forced) vital capacity ratio <0.7 than with the LLN definition, as the fixed ratio underestimates airflow limitation in the young, while it is overestimated in the elderly.This type of descriptive epidemiology research could be considered simple but even such simple studies do face complex methodological challenges...