2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00082-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants, process, and consequences of personal goals and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wood, Atkins and Bright (1999) found that bonuses based on end-of-period appraisal ratings lead to setting more challenging goals but lower performance compared to bonuses based on self-set goals. Moussa (2000) found that a straight piece-rate system coupled with instructions to set hard goals resulted in the highest level of set goals. A downside to pay for performance was also recently demonstrated (Deckop, Mangel & Cirka, 1999).…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood, Atkins and Bright (1999) found that bonuses based on end-of-period appraisal ratings lead to setting more challenging goals but lower performance compared to bonuses based on self-set goals. Moussa (2000) found that a straight piece-rate system coupled with instructions to set hard goals resulted in the highest level of set goals. A downside to pay for performance was also recently demonstrated (Deckop, Mangel & Cirka, 1999).…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been focused on multiple perspectives: for example, the influence of CEO characteristics on performance (Moussa, 2000) and the organizational structure (Hambrick and Mason, 1984). In the same vein, Kochan et al (1986) introduced the idea that management values are an important determinant of HR practices.…”
Section: Influence Of the Management Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectancy theory predicts that employees will be motivated to behave in ways that will result in expected outcomes or rewards (Vroom, 1964). In other words, employees are motivated when they anticipate that their efforts will result in the intended performance goals (expectancy), when they expect that the accomplishment of a performance goal will lead to more rewards (instrumentality), and when they place a high value on those rewards (valence; Moussa, 2000; Vroom, 1964). For instance, Noe (1986) found that when trainees perceived that more effort would enhance their performance in training and that high job performance would be instrumental in obtaining desired outcomes (i.e., rewards), employees were more motivated and indeed performed better.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Locke and Latham (1990) argued that the link between effort and high performance (i.e., expectancy) could be strengthened by employees’ human capital. Taken together with Hypotheses 1 and 2, group-incentive participants of companies with more human capital expect greater goal accomplishment and higher rewards from this accomplishment; this generally leads to stronger job satisfaction and commitment to the organization’s goals (Gerhart & Rynes, 2003; Moussa, 2000). In contrast, if employees do not have confidence in coworkers’ human capital, it seems likely that they would expect poor overall organizational performance despite their own efforts.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%