2014
DOI: 10.1116/1.4901013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination and analysis of minimum dose for achieving vertical sidewall in electron-beam lithography

Abstract: Prior to carrying out the proximity effect correction by optimizing the spatial distribution of dose in electron beam lithography, one first needs to determine the minimum total dose required. A conventional method typically used to determine the minimum total dose is the trial-and-error approach, which can be unnecessarily costly and wasteful. In this paper, two new dose determination methods are described, which utilize the concept of a "critical path" without any proximity effect correction effort. Also, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of developing effective and efficient schemes for correcting the proximity effect has been well recognized for a long time, and various methods were proposed and implemented by many researchers [1]- [14]. As the feature size decreases well below microns into nanoscale (100 nm or less), the line edge roughness (LER) can significantly affect the minimum feature size and the maximum circuit density realizable in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of developing effective and efficient schemes for correcting the proximity effect has been well recognized for a long time, and various methods were proposed and implemented by many researchers [1]- [14]. As the feature size decreases well below microns into nanoscale (100 nm or less), the line edge roughness (LER) can significantly affect the minimum feature size and the maximum circuit density realizable in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work [8,9], a 3-D exposure model was introduced to analyze effects of beam energy, resist thickness, feature size, and developing time on the spatial exposure distribution, i.e., depth-dependent proximity effect. Subsequently, the issue of 3-D proximity effect correction was addressed, deriving the spatial dose distributions required for three different types of resist profiles using a simple search method, and only the simulation results were presented [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%