2021
DOI: 10.3390/sports9060080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of a CrossFit® Benchmark Performance Profile

Abstract: In the trend sport CrossFit®, international competition is held at the CrossFit® Games, known worldwide as the definitive fitness test. Since American athletes are the best in the world regarding CrossFit®, there might be influencing factors on international competition performance. Here, we characterize the benchmark performance profile of American and German CrossFit® athletes (n = 162). To collect the common benchmark performance by questionnaire, 66 male and 96 female CrossFit® athletes (32.6 ± 8.2 years) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CFA are more common women, have longer working hours per week, and train more often per week. CFA's high training volume per week is consistent with previous studies describing over 6 training hours per week on average for German and American athletes [ 18 ]. Our survey indicates CFA train more days per week in comparison with WLA, probably caused by shorter workouts or training time per session.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…CFA are more common women, have longer working hours per week, and train more often per week. CFA's high training volume per week is consistent with previous studies describing over 6 training hours per week on average for German and American athletes [ 18 ]. Our survey indicates CFA train more days per week in comparison with WLA, probably caused by shorter workouts or training time per session.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The performance of the WOD ‘Fran’ is considered most frequently in seven studies [ 37 , 55 , 56 , 61 , 63 , 65 , 66 ]. Thereby, the sample size ranges from 10 to 32 participants when experimental measurements were used for data collection [ 37 , 50 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 65 , 66 ], and with the use of data available online [ 40 , 64 ] or reported data from questionnaires [ 52 , 67 , 68 ], the sample size went up to 220 [ 40 ]. However, upon further consideration, it is unfortunate to note that approximately half of the experimental data acquisitions only include male athletes in the investigation [ 37 , 40 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Table 1 provides an overview of the parameters that significantly predict or are correlated with CrossFit ® performance. Overall, the studies aim to determine factors that are significantly correlated with CrossFit ® performance or that explain most of the variance by using Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation, respectively, [ 37 , 40 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 ], and linear and multiple regression analysis [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ], or principal component analysis [ 56 , 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in metabolic capacity and lung function provided by CrossFit ® are functions of the duration, type and intensity of exercise [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. To assess and monitor fitness while tracking changes in work capacity over time, CrossFit ® has integrated standardized exercises known as benchmark workouts [ 14 , 15 ]. These benchmarks exhibit variations in specific exercise routines/composition, intensity, duration, number/type of exercises and rest periods (see Figure 1 ) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%