1996
DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of a disassembly strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, Johnson andWang (1995,1998) have presented a network flow model for maximising the recovery profit for a given product, balancing component values and disassembly costs. Similarly, Penev and de Ron (1996) consider optimal 'cannibalisation' sequences releasing a number of preselected components from a given product. Meacham et al (1999) extend these approaches to multi-product models involving fixed costs and common parts.…”
Section: Disassemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Johnson andWang (1995,1998) have presented a network flow model for maximising the recovery profit for a given product, balancing component values and disassembly costs. Similarly, Penev and de Ron (1996) consider optimal 'cannibalisation' sequences releasing a number of preselected components from a given product. Meacham et al (1999) extend these approaches to multi-product models involving fixed costs and common parts.…”
Section: Disassemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li-Hsing, 2001 andHu et al 2002). Another group of researches focused on the optimal disassembly or recycling sequence are (Gerner et al 2005;Johnson & Wang, 1995;Penev & Ron, 1996;Gupta, 2002 andLambert, 1997). Das et al (2000) developed a model with seven factors to assess disassembly effort and cost.…”
Section: Reverse Logistics Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the optimal depth of disassembly is determined based on a trade-oOEbetween the values of the disassembled segments and the associated disassembly costs. Though many diOE erent procedures have been proposed to determine this optimal disassembly depth (Navinchandra 1993, Zussman et al 1994, Johnson and Wang 1995, Harjula et al 1996, Penev and De Ron 1996, Jovane et al 1997, Lambert 1997, Johnson and Wang 1998, the generic objective function used to obtain the optimal depth can be expressed as:…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%