1990
DOI: 10.1080/01630569008816357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of a minimal projection fromC[-1, 1] onto the quadratics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good good estimates were attained by cleverly chosing certain`extreme' families of function from X to project. In 1990, the projection constant for 6 2 was found by B. L. Chalmers and F. T. Metcalf (see [1]). In this paper we extend Jameson's results by describing a procedure to find a minimal projection from X=[1, t, t 2 , t |t | _ ] Ä 6 2 for all _ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Good good estimates were attained by cleverly chosing certain`extreme' families of function from X to project. In 1990, the projection constant for 6 2 was found by B. L. Chalmers and F. T. Metcalf (see [1]). In this paper we extend Jameson's results by describing a procedure to find a minimal projection from X=[1, t, t 2 , t |t | _ ] Ä 6 2 for all _ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mainly the problems concern existence (e.g., [7,10]), uniqueness (e.g., [6,9]), and formulas for minimal projections (e.g., [4,5,3]). For basic information concerning this topic, the reader is referred to [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That this problem is non-trivial is clear from the structure of the minimal projection from C[−1, 1] onto the quadratics (see [1] below):…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While Bruce's original idea did not work out, his tenacity kept our team of two working on the project for the next 20 years. Roughly eight years were spent on determining the form of the minimal projection (see [1] below), another eight years to develop a proof of minimality (see [2] below), and a final four years to get the results published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%