2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001280190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of a Standardized Sampling Technique for Pesticide Transferable Turf Residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A “drag sled” method has also been developed that uses a 100-cm 2 patch of denim affixed to the bottom of a sledlike device, whose weight approximates the force exerted by a 10-kg child on a surface ( Byrne et al 1998 ; Vaccaro et al 1996 ). Similar methods have been developed to assess the dislodgeable residue from treated lawns ( Fuller et al 2001 ; Klonne et al 2001 ; Rosenheck et al 2001 ). In theory, the PUF and drag sled methods should give similar results, but no studies have directly compared them.…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A “drag sled” method has also been developed that uses a 100-cm 2 patch of denim affixed to the bottom of a sledlike device, whose weight approximates the force exerted by a 10-kg child on a surface ( Byrne et al 1998 ; Vaccaro et al 1996 ). Similar methods have been developed to assess the dislodgeable residue from treated lawns ( Fuller et al 2001 ; Klonne et al 2001 ; Rosenheck et al 2001 ). In theory, the PUF and drag sled methods should give similar results, but no studies have directly compared them.…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplifi cation effi ciencies were calculated for each primer pair using 1:4 serial dilution of the cDNA template. The amplifi cation effi ciency of each gene was determined to be ³1.9 (Rosenheck et al, 2001). The relative expression was expressed as a ratio of the target gene to the control gene using the formula 2 -(ΔΔCt) according to Livak and Schmittgen (2001) was normalized and expressed as a ratio to the expression in suckling pigs.…”
Section: Quantitative Reverse Transcription-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.5 ± 0.14 c Day 21 3.5 ± 0.60 b a Measured from foil-backed cotton cloth coupons randomly placed and treated during chemical application sequence (n = 5). b Measured from Soxhlet extracted carpet swatches (n = 5).…”
Section: Cyfluthrin Total Cyfluthrin Deposition Residuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] These studies include borax, [12] cyfluthrin, [13] and chlorpyrifos [14−17] and registrant studies that have been referenced in a series of regulatory documents including propetamphos, [18] dichlorvos (DDVP), [19] and pyrethrin. [20] The modified California roller has been Downloaded by [Laurentian University] at 09:28 07 December 2014 adopted as an industry standard [21] and helped form the basis for regulatory default methods for estimating post-application residential exposure. [22−24] From prior studies, it is known that several factors can influence transfer of pesticide residues from a treated surface to a person's skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%