1969
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(69)90157-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of absolute solid-liquid interfacial free energies in metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[19]. Slightly higher estimates are derived from data based on measurements other than nucleation: a = 0.6 was quoted [20] for face-centered cubic (fcc) metals based on data [21] from the dihedral-angle technique [22,23], and a = 0.55 (8) is obtained from analysis considering a combination of measurements in Ref. [24].…”
Section: Magnitudes Of Crystal-melt Interfacial Free Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19]. Slightly higher estimates are derived from data based on measurements other than nucleation: a = 0.6 was quoted [20] for face-centered cubic (fcc) metals based on data [21] from the dihedral-angle technique [22,23], and a = 0.55 (8) is obtained from analysis considering a combination of measurements in Ref. [24].…”
Section: Magnitudes Of Crystal-melt Interfacial Free Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of these methods, pioneered by Turnbull [66][67][68][69][70][71][72] in his nucleation studies of the 1950s, is given by Kelton [73] from which the numbers listed under the MU column in Table 2 have been taken. Column 4 of Table 2 lists values of g derived from measurements of dihedral angles (DA), an approach introduced by Glicksman and Vold [74,75]. Columns 5 and 6 list solid-liquid interfacial free energies derived from measurements of contact Table 1 Melting temperatures (T M ), latent heat (DH fus ), orientation-averaged solid-liquid interfacial free energy (g 0 ), and Turnbull's scaled interfacial free energy (ĝ ¼ g 0 r À2=3 ), for a variety of EAM systems.…”
Section: Comparisons With Experiments and The Turnbull Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One notable example is a series of grain boundary contact angle experiments on bismuth [10] that determined g to be relatively independent of crystal orientation at 61. 3 3 10 23 J͞m 2 , which is about 10% higher than Turnbull's estimate from nucleation rates of 54.…”
Section: (Received 5 July 2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%