2009
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of adsorption isotherms by means of HPLC: Adsorption mechanism elucidation and separation optimization

Abstract: The purpose of this review is to illustrate the most important techniques for isotherm determination by means of HPLC. Starting on the traditional Frontal Analysis approach, Frontal Analysis by Characteristic Point, Elution by Characteristic Point, Perturbation Method in its different applications will be considered to conclude with the most recent Inverse Method approach. Since many of these techniques are based on the fundamentals of nonlinear chromatography, a short overview of the theory of nonlinear chrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many evidences for determination of adsorption isotherms and mechanism by means of HPLC . Like in nonaqueous normal phase, φ is the principal factor controlling the result of separation in the HILIC mode, besides the selection of a suitable stationary phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many evidences for determination of adsorption isotherms and mechanism by means of HPLC . Like in nonaqueous normal phase, φ is the principal factor controlling the result of separation in the HILIC mode, besides the selection of a suitable stationary phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The column dead volume, measured by using KNO 3 as a marker, was 1.93 mL. A solution of Spi(τ‐dec) 0.9% w/v in MeOH/H 2 O 60:40, buffered at pH* = 7.2 with phosphate buffer 10 –2 M, was run through the column (previously equilibrated with the solvent and thermostatted at 30°C), at 0.2 mL/min, in frontal mode , until the breakthrough step was observed and the detector response proved stable. The chiral‐selector load, calculated from the Spi(τ‐dec) breakthrough time, graphically measured, and corrected for the column dead volume, was 0.63 mmol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different interactions between stationary phase and different sample, the molecules move to different rate, therefore separation can be done [20]. B.…”
Section: Fig2 Separation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%