2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2011.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of an adequate screening tool for identification of vulnerable elderly head and neck cancer patients treated with radio(chemo)therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For typical patients of a tertiary cancer center, the VES-13 seems to be a sufficient screening tool to identify frail patients; however, it is still only slightly better than identifying patients by chance. More importantly, the combination of both instruments (VES-13 and G8), as tested by others [40,43], did not show superior results in our group (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…For typical patients of a tertiary cancer center, the VES-13 seems to be a sufficient screening tool to identify frail patients; however, it is still only slightly better than identifying patients by chance. More importantly, the combination of both instruments (VES-13 and G8), as tested by others [40,43], did not show superior results in our group (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This number was based on the result of Pottel et al, who observed an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0.909 (Pottel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty-three percent participated in an observational study recruiting head and neck cancer patients (H&N-group) 3 , 37% in a registry recruiting general oncology patients (GO-group). Drug information was collected once before therapy decision or at therapy start, by a health professional, through the medical interview within CGA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%