2020
DOI: 10.18502/aacc.v6i3.3996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Organisms Isolated from Endotracheal Tube Cultures of Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: Background: It is widely accepted that increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance of pathogens grown in the respiratory system in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is a very serious problem causing expansion of mortality. The most important strategy to prevent the occurrence and appropriate solution to control the antibiotic resistance is to thoroughly investigate the pattern of resistance in the studied ward. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 However, the best substance for oropharyngeal decontamination to prevent VAP with a good effect on pathogenic organisms is controversial, and numerous studies have shown that different organisms cause VAP in a critical care environment and have different patterns of resistance and sensitivity to similar organisms in other environments. [17][18][19] Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a systematic review that not only determines the effects of antiseptic agents or topical antibiotics on the rate of VAP but also show the type of growing organisms so that health care providers could make decisions based on the type of common organisms in their environment and their pattern of antibiotic resistance or sensitivity. The antiseptic agent types should be identified for use in oral hygiene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 However, the best substance for oropharyngeal decontamination to prevent VAP with a good effect on pathogenic organisms is controversial, and numerous studies have shown that different organisms cause VAP in a critical care environment and have different patterns of resistance and sensitivity to similar organisms in other environments. [17][18][19] Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a systematic review that not only determines the effects of antiseptic agents or topical antibiotics on the rate of VAP but also show the type of growing organisms so that health care providers could make decisions based on the type of common organisms in their environment and their pattern of antibiotic resistance or sensitivity. The antiseptic agent types should be identified for use in oral hygiene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sarkar Mohammad et al, 16 Vimal Shiram Rathod et al, 24 Khayyam et al 12 with an isolation rate of 7.0%, 12.3%,15% respectively. But according to Masoum et al 25 Staphylococcus epidermidis was the predominant Gram positive cocci isolated (50.3%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (47.1%)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study Gram positives including MRSA, MSSA, Streptococcus spp showed 100% susceptibility to vancomycin & linezolid which correlates with the findings of Hassan Ahmad et al 23 and Vimal Shiram Rathod et al 24 followed by Tetracycline, co-trimoxazole (64.3%), clindamycin (42.85%), gentamicin (35.71%), oxacillin, amoxyclav, ceftriaxone, cephalothin (28.6%), erythromycin, ciprofloxacin (21.43%) and the least susceptibility is seen with penicillin (14.3%). But according to Masoum et al, 25 the susceptibility rate for vancomycin was 89.65 and for Streptococcus spp, it was shown to be 66.7%. In the present study, Escherichia coli isolates showed 100% susceptibility to polymyxin B correlating with findings of Deepti et al 1 100% and 92.3% by Masoum et al 25 followed by meropenem showing susceptibility rate (66.67%) and 66.66% by Deepti et al, 1 73.1% by Masoum et al 25 followed by Gentamicin & Co-trimoxazole (75%), Imipenem & Amikacin (66.67%), Amoxyclav (50%), Cefaperazone sulbactam, Ciprofloxacin (41.67%), Piperacillin tazobactam, ceftriaxone, Cephalothin (25%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of major threats to our current way of life, with enduring humanitarian and economic consequences if not addressed assertively [ 1 ]. For instance, concerns on the negative influence of the concurrent COVID-19 pandemic over AMR, are arising [ 2 , 3 ], particularly from the extensive use and misuse of mechanical ventilation [ 4 , 5 ]. Moreover, conventional antibiotics’ bacterial resistance advocates exploring less resistance-prone therapeutic approaches [ 6 ], where photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) [ 7 ] has proved as an efficient alternative in the inactivation of several bacterial strains [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%