2008
DOI: 10.1029/2006wr005411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of aperture structure and fluid flow in a rock fracture by high‐resolution numerical modeling on the basis of a flow‐through experiment under confining pressure

Abstract: [1] A numerical model incorporating experimentally determined fracture surface geometries and fracture permeability is proposed for characterizing aperture structures and fluid flow through rock fractures under confining pressures. The model was applied to artificially created granite tensile fractures with varying shear displacements (0-10 mm) and confining pressures (10-100 MPa). The findings of the study were consistent with those obtained previously, which characterized experimentally determined contact ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
148
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
148
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean apertures of the sandstone sample are significantly lower and range between 0.031 and 0.024 mm (Huo and Benson, 2015). Nevertheless, with increasing stresses, hydraulic apertures of the granite fracture decrease from 0.009 to 0.003 mm (Watanabe et al, 2008) while hydraulic apertures of the sandstone fracture decrease from approximately 0.030 to 0.005 mm (Huo and Benson, 2015). These significant hydraulic differences of the samples appear to be caused by higher tortuosity as described by Tsang (1984) due to a higher roughness of the tensile granite fractures as compared with the smooth sandstone fracture.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mean apertures of the sandstone sample are significantly lower and range between 0.031 and 0.024 mm (Huo and Benson, 2015). Nevertheless, with increasing stresses, hydraulic apertures of the granite fracture decrease from 0.009 to 0.003 mm (Watanabe et al, 2008) while hydraulic apertures of the sandstone fracture decrease from approximately 0.030 to 0.005 mm (Huo and Benson, 2015). These significant hydraulic differences of the samples appear to be caused by higher tortuosity as described by Tsang (1984) due to a higher roughness of the tensile granite fractures as compared with the smooth sandstone fracture.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both rock types, Zenifim sandstone and granite, reveal similar matrix permeabilities (10 −18 to 10 −19 m 2 ), fluid flow experiments with the fractured sandstone obtain higher permeabilities (between 10 −14 and 10 −15 m 2 ) than granite experiments (between 10 −15 and 10 −17 m 2 ). Typically, mean apertures of mated tensile fractures in Inada granite should decrease from 0.071 to 0.065 mm, applying loading from 10 to 100 MPa (Watanabe et al, 2008). Mean apertures of the sandstone sample are significantly lower and range between 0.031 and 0.024 mm (Huo and Benson, 2015).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diversos estudos (Watanabe et al, 2008;Becker e Tsoflias, 2010;Wang e Cardenas, 2014;Ishibashi et al, 2015) têm reportado a presença de caminhos preferenciais de alta condutividade hidráulica (channeling) que permitem o transporte de solutos em pequenas regiões da fratura com velocidade acima da velocidade média. Por isso, a modelagem do transporte de soluto necessita de uma caracterização precisa e acurada do campo de velocidades do escoamento dentro da fratura (Bodin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Lista De Figurasunclassified