2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-004-0232-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Arsenic in Food Samples by Hydride Generation ? Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the acid concentration has a negligible effect on the analytes sensitivity, within the range studied. Similar results have been reported by Coelho 38 and Moretto 39 and differ from that obtained when a conventional hydride generator (a separate mixing/reaction coil and gas-liquid separator) is used, where a strong dependency is generally obtained between sensitivity and HCl concentration. [40][41][42] Figures 3 and 4 show the effect of reductant and sample solution uptake rates on the As and Se absorption signals respectively.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Hydride Generationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the acid concentration has a negligible effect on the analytes sensitivity, within the range studied. Similar results have been reported by Coelho 38 and Moretto 39 and differ from that obtained when a conventional hydride generator (a separate mixing/reaction coil and gas-liquid separator) is used, where a strong dependency is generally obtained between sensitivity and HCl concentration. [40][41][42] Figures 3 and 4 show the effect of reductant and sample solution uptake rates on the As and Se absorption signals respectively.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Hydride Generationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It was reported that the arsenic levels in fish were 0.05-1.4 g/g (wet weight) [24] in Lake Michigan, 6.1-11.8 g/g (dry weight) [25] and 2.12-15.2 g/g (dry weight) [26] in Lake Manchar, Pakistan, 0.038-0.309 g/g (dry weight) [27] in River Neretva, Croatia, 0.396-12.58 g/g [28] in southeastern Spain and 0.57-1.15 g/g [29] in five different fish species in Back Bay, Great Slave Lake, near the city of Yellowknife, NT, Canada. It was also reported that the arsenic contents in freshwater fish were respectively 1.6-3.8 and 7.9-22.2 g/g in non-contaminated and contaminated areas of Thailand [30], 0.097-1.32 g/g in Bangladesh [31], and 0.27-10.3 g/g [32] in Brazil. Compared with the above results, the arsenic concentrations in fish and shrimps collected in Yangzonghai after the pollution accident were at a relatively high level.…”
Section: The Arsenic Levels In Aquatic Animalsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Interferences from selenite can be attributed to competitive reactions in which the selenite competes with the arsenic species for sodium tetrahydroborate to form hydrides. 21,22 When measured under the same condition (0.1 M HCl with 0.5% L-cysteine), the sensitivities for DMA and MMA are 50% and 17% of that for arsenite, respectively. The presence of these methylated compounds would constitute an interference, but as was pointed out in the introduction, 3 these compounds are not found in ground waters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%