2009
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-1092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of ASCO recommended prognostic factors uPA and PAI-1 in daily clinical routine and the node-negative NNBC 3-Europe trial.

Abstract: #1092 The American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer suggests the use of the invasion markers urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 for risk assessment (Harris et al. JCO 25:5287). In 2003, we launched the NNBC 3-Europe trial for node negative breast cancer patients with the following questions:
 1) Comparison of risk-assessment: invasion markers uPA/PAI-1 vs. clinico-pathological fact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enrolled more than 4000 patients, stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the uPA/PAI-1 value or according to the clinical pathological algorithm. Those classified as low risk did not receive CT, whereas those classified as high risk received either six cycles of FEC or three cycles of FEC and three cycles of docetaxel [21] . In the West German Study Group Plan B trial, a prospective comparison of recurrence score (RS) – OncotypeDx – and independent central pathology assessment of prognostic tools was performed.…”
Section: Which Ebc Patients Can Safely Avoid Adjuvant Chemotherapy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enrolled more than 4000 patients, stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the uPA/PAI-1 value or according to the clinical pathological algorithm. Those classified as low risk did not receive CT, whereas those classified as high risk received either six cycles of FEC or three cycles of FEC and three cycles of docetaxel [21] . In the West German Study Group Plan B trial, a prospective comparison of recurrence score (RS) – OncotypeDx – and independent central pathology assessment of prognostic tools was performed.…”
Section: Which Ebc Patients Can Safely Avoid Adjuvant Chemotherapy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those classified as low risk did not receive chemotherapy, whereas those classified as high risk received either six cycles of fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy or three cycles of FEC chemotherapy and three cycles of docetaxel [10]. It is important to note that 10% of the patients enrolled were from France, which as a country did not immediately adopt the uPA/PAI-1 test, suggesting that committed research centers can effectively change postsurgical tissue handling procedures so that the freshfrozen tissue uPA/PAI-1 biomarker assay can be performed.…”
Section: Risk Stratification In Node-negative Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups. Those classified as low risk did not receive chemotherapy, whereas those classified as high risk received either six cycles of fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy or three cycles of FEC chemotherapy and three cycles of docetaxel [10].…”
Section: Risk Stratification In Node-negative Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%