Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis

Abstract

Objective To determine whether EEG spectral analysis could be used to demonstrate awareness in patients with severe brain injury. Methods We recorded EEG from healthy controls and three patients with severe brain injury, ranging from minimally conscious state (MCS) to locked-in-state (LIS), while they were asked to imagine motor and spatial navigation tasks. We assessed EEG spectral differences from 4 to 24 Hz with univariate comparisons (individual frequencies) and multivariate comparisons (patterns across the frequency range). Results In controls, EEG spectral power differed at multiple frequency bands and channels during performance of both tasks compared to a resting baseline. As patterns of signal change were inconsistent between controls, we defined a positive response in patient subjects as consistent spectral changes across task performances. One patient in MCS and one in LIS showed evidence of motor imagery task performance, though with patterns of spectral change different from the controls. Conclusion EEG power spectral analysis demonstrates evidence for performance of mental imagery tasks in healthy controls and patients with severe brain injury. Significance EEG power spectral analysis can be used as a flexible bedside tool to demonstrate awareness in brain-injured patients who are otherwise unable to communicate.

Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science

“…Structural and functional neuroimaging strategies and electrophysiological techniques have garnered scientific and clinical attention in light of increasing evidence that they can detect active cognitive processing in the absence of behavioural signs of consciousness. [53][54][55] Behavioural assessment…”

A Comparison of Propofol- and Dexmedetomidine-induced Electroencephalogram Dynamics Using Spectral and Coherence Analysis: Erratum

“…26,27 This method accounts for the underlying spectral resolution of the spectral and coherence estimates, and considers differences to be significant if they are present for contiguous frequencies over a range greater than the spectral resolution 2W. Specifically, for frequencies f > 2W, the null hypothesis was rejected only if the test statistic exceeded the significance threshold over a contiguous frequency range ≥ 2W.…”

Severe Brain Injury and Organ Solicitation: A Call for Temperance

“…Although investigative efforts are under way to better understand mechanisms of recovery and prognosticate outcomes for patients with disorders of consciousness, using methodologies like functional neuroimaging [19,20] and electroencephalography [21], these interventions remain experimental, and sometimes the bedside exam, functional imaging, and EEG can yield discordant results [22,23]. Thus, it is important to stress that, despite the media hype often occasioned by neuroscience results [24], these methods are not yet ready for clinical use.…”