2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.11.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of binding constants by affinity chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissociation constant of the complex of the screened DP and the SP was determined by frontal affinity chromatography (Shai et al, 1987;Winzor, 2004). The SP immobilized column was equilibrated with 10 mM phosphate buffer plus 150 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Determination Of Affinity Constant Of Immobilized Sp and Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissociation constant of the complex of the screened DP and the SP was determined by frontal affinity chromatography (Shai et al, 1987;Winzor, 2004). The SP immobilized column was equilibrated with 10 mM phosphate buffer plus 150 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Determination Of Affinity Constant Of Immobilized Sp and Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques, such as ultrafiltration [18], affinity chromatography [19,20], surface plasmon resonance [21,22], scintillation proximity assay [23,24], NMR spectroscopy [25], and immunoassay [26], have been used to evaluate the binding properties of ligands for proteins and to develop screening methods with different throughput. Also, affinity CE (ACE) has been successfully applied to study the binding of ligands for receptors and some examples of the application of the technique to the screening of chemical libraries are reported [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in retention time (Δt) from maximal retention of the reporter molecule reflects the fraction of the sites that is occupied by the competing molecules according to the Langmuir isotherm, assuming a one-to-one interaction (Winzor, 2004):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%