2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00141-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of clenbuterol in human urine by GC–MS–MS–MS: confirmation analysis in antidoping control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, different analytical methods have been reported for the determination of β-agonists in many biological samples, including ultra high-performance liquid chromatographymass spectrometry [8], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [9,10], conventional liquid 3 chromatography-mass spectrometry [11][12][13], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [14], capillary electrophoresis [15], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [16], and immunosensors [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, different analytical methods have been reported for the determination of β-agonists in many biological samples, including ultra high-performance liquid chromatographymass spectrometry [8], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [9,10], conventional liquid 3 chromatography-mass spectrometry [11][12][13], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [14], capillary electrophoresis [15], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [16], and immunosensors [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most screening procedures applied to b 2 -agonists are based on GC/MS analysis after derivatization (Damasceno et al, , 2002Ramos et al, 1998;Henze et al, 2001;Ventura et al, 2000), even if an increasing number of protocols using LC/MS have been published (Polettini, 1996;Kolmonen et al, 2007). Multiple-MS detection, after GC or LC separation, has also been proposed in order to improve the instrumental sensitivity and selectivity, especially for confi rmation purposes (Amendola et al, 2002;Thevis et al, 2003;Marcos et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] At present, routine testing techniques in athletic sports are centred around multidimensional instrumental approaches for abused-drug analysis, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), [5] highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC), [6,7] capillary electrophoresis (CE), [8] and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), [9] and may incorporate tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) [10] approaches for enhanced sensitivity and/or identification. These current approaches clearly involve not only expensive instruments, but also a large number of separate analytical procedures, resulting in a more-complex, timeconsuming and laborious screening procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%