2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(03)00707-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of clenbuterol in pig liver by high-performance liquid chromatography with a coulometric electrode array system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report shows that the method is able to quantify N-caffeoyldopamine and N-caffeoyltyramine in biological samples with excellent detection limits (100 fmol), peak resolutions, discrete retention times (respective retention times are 4 and 6.4 min respective), and consistent reproducibility. Zhang et al have reported a HPLC with a coulometric electrode array system for determination of clenbuterol that contains an electroactive aromatic amino group [38]. Some typical examples of HPLC determination using coulometric detectors was listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Coulometric Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This report shows that the method is able to quantify N-caffeoyldopamine and N-caffeoyltyramine in biological samples with excellent detection limits (100 fmol), peak resolutions, discrete retention times (respective retention times are 4 and 6.4 min respective), and consistent reproducibility. Zhang et al have reported a HPLC with a coulometric electrode array system for determination of clenbuterol that contains an electroactive aromatic amino group [38]. Some typical examples of HPLC determination using coulometric detectors was listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Coulometric Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional pre-treatment ones are mainly reliant on liquidliquid extraction (LLE) (Courtheyn et al, 1991;de Wasch et al, 1998;Keskin et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2003) or solid-phase extraction (SPE) (Horne et al, 1998;Bruins et al, 1999;Li et al, 2010). However, these two classic methods have timeconsuming cleanup steps and require large quantities of toxic organic solvents in order to obtain a homogeneous liquid phase containing an analyte of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the quantitative methods currently used by most laboratories were gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The preparative step before injection was complicated and timeconsuming for the former method [16], while low sensitivity was limited for the later method [17]. The connected use of HPLC-MS was powerful for the detection of CLB, however, the complicated and expensive instrument could not apply to routine monitoring [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%