2003
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/24/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of complex refractive index of polystyrene microspheres from 370 to 1610 nm

Abstract: We introduce an inverse method for determining simultaneously the real and imaginary refractive indices of microspheres based on integrating sphere measurements of diffuse reflectance and transmittance, and Monte Carlo modelling in conjunction with the Mie theory. The results for polystyrene microspheres suspended in water are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
248
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
22
248
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are lower than the retrieved values reported here. However, the values reported here are more consistent with Chartier and Greenslade (2012), who recently measured a real part of the refractive index n = 1.81 (±0.03) at λ = 248 nm and n = 1.72 (±0.02) at λ = 335 nm, which is greater than the results reported for particles in suspension by French et al (2007) and Ma et al (2003).…”
Section: R a Washenfelder Et Al: Aerosol Extinction In The Uv Specsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are lower than the retrieved values reported here. However, the values reported here are more consistent with Chartier and Greenslade (2012), who recently measured a real part of the refractive index n = 1.81 (±0.03) at λ = 248 nm and n = 1.72 (±0.02) at λ = 335 nm, which is greater than the results reported for particles in suspension by French et al (2007) and Ma et al (2003).…”
Section: R a Washenfelder Et Al: Aerosol Extinction In The Uv Specsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Refractive indices have been reported for bulk samples (Matheson and Saunderson, 1952;Nikolov and Ivanov, 2000;Sultanova et al, 2003), particles in suspension (Bateman et al, 1959;Smart and Willis, 1967;Ma et al, 2003;French et al, 2007), and aerosol particles (Pettersson et al, 2004;Abo Riziq et al, 2007;Baynard et al, 2007;Lang-Yona et al, 2009;Chartier and Greenslade, 2012). These measurements are nicely summarized by Miles et al (2010), with the exception of the more recent Chartier and Greenslade (2012) result.…”
Section: Comparison Of Psl Refractive Index To Published Valuesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The real part of the refractive index returned by the program for the corrected data was 1.668, an increase of 2.5% on the value of 1.627 calculated if aerosol was assumed to fill the whole 90-cm length of the cavity. In both calculations, the imaginary part of the refractive index was taken as 5 × 10 −4 (Ma et al 2003). The potential systematic error introduced by considering the two extremes in the value of l is significantly higher than the 1% precision typically quoted in A-CRDS publications.…”
Section: Uncertainty In the Length Of The Aerosol Sample Within The Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such approximation is the assumption of electrically large scatterer in the medium. In the results presented in this paper the scatterers are electrically large, ka ≈ [30, 165], where k is the wave number of the microspheres relative to the background material in the cuvette [10], and a is the average radius of the spheres. In this section, a review of the approximation employed in this paper is presented.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%