“…[9] In our case within the set of crowns 12C4, 15C5, 18C6, DB18C6, DB21C7 and DB24C8 the D Cs L are changing in a non monotonous way as the cavity size [22,23] is increasing, indicating a maximal value for DB21C7 (Table 1, Figure 2). Crown cavity size R L , nm [22,23] 12C4 Extraction is not detected 1.42 [19] No data 0.06 15C5 17 2.0 0.30 1.75 [19] 0.80 [17] 0.086-0.092 18C6 50 19 1.3 3.40 [19] 0.96 [17] 0.134-0.143 DB18C6 26 14 1.3 3.47 [20] 0.74 [21] 0.134-0.143 DB21C7 82 47 1.7 3.52 [20] No data 0.17 DB24C8 46 8.6 0.9 2.91 [20] 1.41 [21] 0.20 Indeed, for 12С4, 15С5, 18С6 and DB18C6 the cavity size is smaller than cesium ion diameter (0.17 nm [22] ), while for DB24C8 it is remarkably bigger. According to the crystallographic data and the structural data for the aqueous phase [24,25] the cesium cation in its complexes with 18C6 is placed slightly above the plane, constituted by the oxygen atoms of the ligand, being a bit bigger than the cave size.…”