2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2008.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of contact parameters for discrete element method simulations of granular systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of k t is taken as (2/7)k n as suggested by Silbert et al (2001). Different authors have used values for k n ranging from 1000 N m −1 (Milburn et al 2005;Malone & Xu 2008;Biswas et al 2003) up to 18,000 N m −1 (Richard et al 2008) for similar materials, the difference being the type of system that was simulated. The former dealt with a system in which collision speeds were damped due to an interstitial fluid and the fluid was the driving mechanism behind the phenomenon that was observed.…”
Section: Particle-particle Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value of k t is taken as (2/7)k n as suggested by Silbert et al (2001). Different authors have used values for k n ranging from 1000 N m −1 (Milburn et al 2005;Malone & Xu 2008;Biswas et al 2003) up to 18,000 N m −1 (Richard et al 2008) for similar materials, the difference being the type of system that was simulated. The former dealt with a system in which collision speeds were damped due to an interstitial fluid and the fluid was the driving mechanism behind the phenomenon that was observed.…”
Section: Particle-particle Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the choice of parameters seems to relate to the phenomena being analyzed much more than to the nature of the materials being simulated if a linear spring-dashpot model is used. The works of Yuu (Yuu et al 1995) and Malone (Malone & Xu 2008) point to the differences and advantages of different choices in parameters. When a Hertzian spring is used the values for the elastic constants are much higher and can be calculated from the real Young's moduli and Poison's ratios of the materials (Teufelsbauer et al 2009).…”
Section: Particle-particle Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In calculating the collision force using DEM, it is generally accepted that the DEM time step size should be less than a certain critical value. The common relational form for time step size is that defined using the particle mass and stiffness: 18) Át c C ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi…”
Section: Distinct Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches that have been used to reduce the computational load of DEM as mentioned by Malone and Xu [4], including the use of more advanced contact detection algorithms, parallel computing techniques, novel numerical time integration schemes, simple contact models, and a larger reasonable time step. Theoretically, all of the approaches can be used to speed up CFD-DEM simulation, but a larger time step seems like a simple one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%