2016
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2016.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of critical chain project buffer based on information flow interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e RSEM calculates the square root of the total squares of the difference between the safety estimate time and the average estimate time for each activity on the critical chain as the PB and that on the noncritical chain as the FB. Zhang et al argued that the RSEM outperformed the CAP method for large projects because the former was less affected by critical chain length [8]. Furthermore, considering that various project characteristics and attributes could influence buffer sizes, several modified buffer-sizing methods have been proposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e RSEM calculates the square root of the total squares of the difference between the safety estimate time and the average estimate time for each activity on the critical chain as the PB and that on the noncritical chain as the FB. Zhang et al argued that the RSEM outperformed the CAP method for large projects because the former was less affected by critical chain length [8]. Furthermore, considering that various project characteristics and attributes could influence buffer sizes, several modified buffer-sizing methods have been proposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although great advances have been made on buffersizing methods, they all assume that project activities are independent and neglect the codependency of activities, as well as the effect of rework risks arising from information flow interactions on project duration. ese factors resulted in smaller estimated project durations than necessary [8]. As previously mentioned, Zhang et al proposed a refined DSMbased CCPM method, which took the codependency of activities and rework risks into account when determining buffer sizes [8], but this method still has several limitations on modeling rework and determining rework safety times, which deserves further research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The activity dependency criteria were originally introduced by Leach [18] in the context of the CC/PM. Zhang et al [19] proved that the codependency among project activity durations produced by the complexity has signi cant impact on bu er sizes. On this basis, the concepts of the rework safety time and rework probability matrix were introduced to be utilized in the bu er sizing procedure.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%