2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aaab7d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Debye temperatures and Lamb–Mössbauer factors for LnFeO3orthoferrite perovskites (Ln  =  La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd)

Abstract: Lanthanide orthoferrites have wide-ranging industrial uses including solar, catalytic and electronic applications. Here a series of lanthanide orthoferrite perovskites, LnFeO<sub>3</sub> (Ln = La; Nd; Sm; Eu; Gd), prepared through a standard stoichiometric wet ball milling route using oxide precursors, has been studied. Characterisation through X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence confirmed the synthesis of phase-pure or near-pure LnFeO<sub>3</sub> compounds. <sup>57</sub&g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the values of ⟨Fe–O–Fe⟩ follow the trend AFeO 3 > β-FeOOH > ZnFe 2 O 4 , as displayed in Figure b. Notably, the average Fe–O–Fe angle of AFeO 3 increases at the same pace with the increment of A-site ionic radii, which agrees well with previous reports. , In addition, it is necessary to mention that the only value of the Fe–O–Fe angle in ZnFe 2 O 4 (94.854°) is sharply larger than the smallest one in β-FeOOH (86.619°). According to the above analysis, the main distortion in AFeO 3 , ZnFe 2 O 4 , and β-FeOOH is FeO 6 octahedral tilting.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, the values of ⟨Fe–O–Fe⟩ follow the trend AFeO 3 > β-FeOOH > ZnFe 2 O 4 , as displayed in Figure b. Notably, the average Fe–O–Fe angle of AFeO 3 increases at the same pace with the increment of A-site ionic radii, which agrees well with previous reports. , In addition, it is necessary to mention that the only value of the Fe–O–Fe angle in ZnFe 2 O 4 (94.854°) is sharply larger than the smallest one in β-FeOOH (86.619°). According to the above analysis, the main distortion in AFeO 3 , ZnFe 2 O 4 , and β-FeOOH is FeO 6 octahedral tilting.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, q is the number of atoms, N is the Avogadro’s number, and M is the molecular weight of the solid. Furthermore, it is noteworthy to mention that our calculated θ D values were relatively close with the earlier experimental values reported in ref for RFeO 3 , with less than 10% percent difference. While it is surprising to see that our calculated values of θ D are relatively high when compared to other TE materials, these θ D values are obtained for RFeO 3 , which are meant to operate at high-temperature regions (above 900 K).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A program was constructed, which Debye temperature and an IS would be simulated, resulting in theoretical SODS and CS. As given in reference [ 20,29 ], the IS values for the FeO was taken as 0.61 mm/s and the variation of CS values for different Debye temperatures were simulated. Similarly, attempts were made to estimate Debye temperature for FeT using various values of IS and Θ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%