2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane in river and estuarine sediments in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, D5 concentrations in sediments were in agreement with the results obtained in previous studies (low ng/g to low μg/g), as for example those from the Songhua River (Zhang et al, 2011), and lower than the concentrations determined in the River Great Ouse and the Humber estuary (Sparham et al, 2011), and in the Himmerfjärden and in the lake Vänern (Kaj et al, 2005). Exceptionally, high concentrations of D5 were detected in SED-F, which was from a stagnant section of the river where accumulation is expected.…”
Section: Analysis Of Surface Water and Sedimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, D5 concentrations in sediments were in agreement with the results obtained in previous studies (low ng/g to low μg/g), as for example those from the Songhua River (Zhang et al, 2011), and lower than the concentrations determined in the River Great Ouse and the Humber estuary (Sparham et al, 2011), and in the Himmerfjärden and in the lake Vänern (Kaj et al, 2005). Exceptionally, high concentrations of D5 were detected in SED-F, which was from a stagnant section of the river where accumulation is expected.…”
Section: Analysis Of Surface Water and Sedimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, in most of the studies the analysis of sediments has been carried out by solid-liquid extraction (SLE) (Sparham et al, 2011;Warner et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011), presenting LODs in the 0.5-1.0 ng/g order. Accelerated solvent liquid extraction (ASE) was also explored in a recent study (Sparham et al, 2011), showing that while ASE is a high-throughput and automatable technique blank contamination was still high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are considered high production volume chemicals, having annual productions for some of them of 45-227 thousand tons worldwide; however, recent reports raise concern about the potential toxic effects of cyclic siloxanes [116]. Siloxanes are likely to be discharged into sewage systems through the use of "rinse-off" products and partially adsorbed onto sludge in WWTPs due to their high Kow and released to the aquatic environment through wastewater discharges [117][118][119], having also been found in sewage sludge [115,119] and sediment [119,120]. The siloxane family includes octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5), dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) and tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane (D7) [118].…”
Section: Siloxanesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Este procedimiento ha resultado efectivo para minimizar la contaminación de fondo en el análisis de diferentes tipos de muestras, incluyendo aire, biota y sedimentos y ha sido el empleado por la mayor parte de los autores. 33,39,[42][43][44] A modo de…”
Section: Contaminación De Fondounclassified
“…Los disolventes comúnmente utilizados son: n-hexano, n-pentano, acetonitrilo, clorobenceno, y mezclas acetato de etilo/n-hexano y diclorometano/n-hexano [11][12][13]39,44,48,[55][56][57][58][59] . Como alternativa a la extracción con disolvente mediante agitación, también se ha aplicado la extracción asistida por ultrasonidos (UAE) 51,59,60 y la extracción con líquidos presurizados (PLE), 43 sin embargo, estos métodos no son recomendables dado el hecho de que pueden producirse pérdidas de los analitos más volátiles al utilizarse elevadas temperaturas y presión. Debe decirse que de manera general, en los métodos que aplican la extracción con disolventes, se han logrado alcanzar recuperaciones superiores al 70% y LODs entre 0.003 y 37 ng g -1 p.s.…”
Section: Pérdidas Por Volatilizaciónunclassified