2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Dynamical Heterogeneity from Dynamic Neutron Scattering of Proteins

Abstract: Motional displacements of hydrogen (H) in proteins can be measured using incoherent neutron-scattering methods. These displacements can also be calculated numerically using data from molecular dynamics simulations. An enormous amount of data on the average mean-square motional displacement (MSD) of H as a function of protein temperature, hydration, and other conditions has been collected. H resides in a wide spectrum of sites in a protein. Some H are tightly bound to molecular chains, and the H motion is dicta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Meinhold et al used a Weibull distribution, 25 and Peters and Kneller used a gamma distribution 26 based on the work of Kneller and Hinsen. 27 Most recently, a bimodal Gaussian distribution was investigated by Vural et al 28 Doster also addressed the issue of protein dynamical heterogeneity by suggesting three different approaches to it. 29 His main conclusion was to say that data can be fitted as successful when heterogeneity is reduced to two kinds of molecular processes, one corresponding to translational and the other to rotational (coming mainly from methyl groups) motions, the latter being non-Gaussian scattering processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Meinhold et al used a Weibull distribution, 25 and Peters and Kneller used a gamma distribution 26 based on the work of Kneller and Hinsen. 27 Most recently, a bimodal Gaussian distribution was investigated by Vural et al 28 Doster also addressed the issue of protein dynamical heterogeneity by suggesting three different approaches to it. 29 His main conclusion was to say that data can be fitted as successful when heterogeneity is reduced to two kinds of molecular processes, one corresponding to translational and the other to rotational (coming mainly from methyl groups) motions, the latter being non-Gaussian scattering processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meinhold et al used a Weibull distribution and Peters and Kneller a Gamma distribution . Most recently, a bimodal Gaussian distribution was introduced by Vural et al All of these methods represent interesting aspects and permit a better although more complex description of the data. In a representative manner, we applied the model recently developed by Peters and Kneller that, unlike the MSD, permits the inclusion of data over the entire Q -range.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%