1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(99)00201-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of earthquake epicentroids by inversion of gravity variation data in the BTTZ region, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The positive, or negative, summit of a RGC deformation is usually close to the epicenter (see Figs. 4−7 and Table 1 in case of A, C, F and H earthquakes), but there are also some exception with certain distance from the epicenter (see the pictures of B and G earthquakes) which might be explained by the study of Professor Kuo: in BTTZ region, epicenter usually locates at the fault end or its intersection while the epicentroid, which is the earth surface projection of the beneath mass center of emigrant mass, usually locates in a whole block (Kuo et al, 1999). From the study of a sample of 16 earthquakes (M > 4.0), the difference between the two is mostly in the range of 0−40 km (Zheng et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The positive, or negative, summit of a RGC deformation is usually close to the epicenter (see Figs. 4−7 and Table 1 in case of A, C, F and H earthquakes), but there are also some exception with certain distance from the epicenter (see the pictures of B and G earthquakes) which might be explained by the study of Professor Kuo: in BTTZ region, epicenter usually locates at the fault end or its intersection while the epicentroid, which is the earth surface projection of the beneath mass center of emigrant mass, usually locates in a whole block (Kuo et al, 1999). From the study of a sample of 16 earthquakes (M > 4.0), the difference between the two is mostly in the range of 0−40 km (Zheng et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the potential of using gravity data for earthquake research was recognized nearly 50 years ago [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], there existed few cases demonstrating the usefulness of gravity monitoring data for useful earthquake forecast. Based on discussions presented above, we argue that information derived from large-scale regional gravity monitoring data has the potential to be used as a precursor for forecasting large earthquakes in a medium-term of no more than five years, particularly when that information is combined with expert knowledge about historic seismic activities, seismicity rate, as well as geological and tectonic conditions in the region in question.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the gravity variation belts of transition for the gravity variation more likely correspond to a large earthquake. Kuo et al (1999) proposed a hypothesis named the epicentroid model (concept likened to hypocentroid) to explain this phenomena of gravity precursor.…”
Section: Gravity Data and Earthquake Cataloguementioning
confidence: 99%