2019
DOI: 10.1111/str.12332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of effective stress intensity factors under mixed‐mode from digital image correlation fields in presence of contact stresses and plasticity

Abstract: Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is more and more popular to monitor fatigue crack growth and to determine the stress intensity factors. However, the post-treatment of the recorded displacement fields becomes tricky when the crack faces are not stress-free and when crack tip plasticity becomes significant. Several post-treatment methods to locate the crack tip and measure the effective SIFs in such cases are compared, using FEM-computed displacement fields, and then used on real DIC fields. An approach coupling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 4 hour annealing treatment at 450°C in a vacuum was applied to relax, as far as possible, the residual stresses left by rail manufacturing and subsequent machining. A method based on the projection of the measured displacement field over William's series expansion of the near tip displacement field at order 7 was used to locate both crack tips, using image pairs captured at peak tensile load and after a small elastic unloading (see Appendix B or [21]). Iterations were performed over the crack tip position to minimize the error between theoretical and measured fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 4 hour annealing treatment at 450°C in a vacuum was applied to relax, as far as possible, the residual stresses left by rail manufacturing and subsequent machining. A method based on the projection of the measured displacement field over William's series expansion of the near tip displacement field at order 7 was used to locate both crack tips, using image pairs captured at peak tensile load and after a small elastic unloading (see Appendix B or [21]). Iterations were performed over the crack tip position to minimize the error between theoretical and measured fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation of the effective SIFs in such cases is a problem in itself, which has been discussed in detail in [21]. The method which was specifically developed is just briefly explained below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method has later been improved by Bertolino & Doquet [33] to separate, through numerical simulations, the opposite effects of crack face friction and crack tip plasticity on the measured sliding displacements, and get a more accurate estimate of ΔK , . More recently, Bonniot et al [34] improved the method further, to overcome the limitations associated with the assumption of stress-free crack faces in the traditional post-treatment of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) data to determine ΔK , . A normal compressive stress reduces the effective ΔK because of an enhanced friction between the crack lips [14,23], and thus reduces the mode II crack growth rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, two main approaches emerges in literature concerning the fitting of theoretical models on the full displacement fields: the first one is based on guessing a general form of an analytical function and fitting this to the displacement experimental data: an example is the complex function analysis of Muskhelishvili [16], which was further developed to calculate mixed mode (I + II) [17] and generalized to cases without restrictions in boundary conditions or symmetry [18]. The second approach is based on the Williams' model [19][20][21][22], where the fitting on the experimental data is done by considering the first n term of the Williams expansion for the displacement. In this work this latter approach was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%