PsycEXTRA Dataset 1980
DOI: 10.1037/e463142004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of efficient methods of lift by comparing trained and untrained male and female lifters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weights of the wooden materials were 15, 18 and 24lbs and do not exceed the Recommended Weight Limit – 51lbs for two-handed manual lifting tasks (Waters et al , 1994). The weights were varied based on the maximum selected load and experimental conditions as observed in several manual material handling studies (Lim, 2019; Plamondon et al , 2012; Shannon, 1978).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of the wooden materials were 15, 18 and 24lbs and do not exceed the Recommended Weight Limit – 51lbs for two-handed manual lifting tasks (Waters et al , 1994). The weights were varied based on the maximum selected load and experimental conditions as observed in several manual material handling studies (Lim, 2019; Plamondon et al , 2012; Shannon, 1978).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assessment of biomechanical exposures to lifting is non-trivial due to the multiple factors besides load magnitude that affect the risk of low back disorder from lifting. Risk factors include task parameters such as lifting frequency, duration, load moment arm characterized by the horizontal and vertical lifting height, asymmetry angle, and associated movement kinematics (e.g., trunk lateral velocity, trunk twisting velocity, and trunk sagittal angle) (Shannon, 1978;Herrin et al, 1974;Waters et al, 1994;Davis & Marras, 2005). Assessing biomechanical exposures and low back disorder risk associated with lifting-lowering is particularly challenging in non-repetitive work conditions where the magnitude, repetition and duration of activity may differ between workers and within worker across time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%