2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2016.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of elemental composition of shale rocks by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy

Abstract: In this study laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is used for elemental characterization of outcrop samples from the Marcellus Shale. Powdered samples were pressed to form pellets and used for LIBS analysis. Partial least squares regression (PLS-R) and univariate calibration curves were used for quantification of analytes. The matrix effect is substantially reduced using the partial least squares calibration method. Predicted results with LIBS are compared to ICP-OES results for Si, Al, Ti, Mg, and Ca.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The R 2 of area (C) is also not satisfactory for quantification even it is slightly higher than the two peaks above-mentioned. The reason is that the univariate analysis is compromised by both matrix effect and sample complexity (Hou et al, 2016 ; Sanghapi et al, 2016 ). It is therefore expected that the multivariate analysis could improve the calibration performance through latent projection instead of univariate regression, and PLS was chosen as it is mostly adopted in multivariate calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R 2 of area (C) is also not satisfactory for quantification even it is slightly higher than the two peaks above-mentioned. The reason is that the univariate analysis is compromised by both matrix effect and sample complexity (Hou et al, 2016 ; Sanghapi et al, 2016 ). It is therefore expected that the multivariate analysis could improve the calibration performance through latent projection instead of univariate regression, and PLS was chosen as it is mostly adopted in multivariate calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that the multivariate analysis is superior to univariate analysis. This has been proven by numerous researchers, for instance, the analysis of rocks [49], rare earth elements [38], glass [50], cerium oxide [51], alloy steel [52], liquid steel [53], soil [54,55], soybean oil [56], PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate) ceramics [57], Pb in navel orange [58], Marcellus Shale [59], tailing cores [60], geologically diverse samples [49], steel melt [61], slurry [62], iron ore [63] and pellets of plant materials [64].…”
Section: The Comparison Of Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these moments are defined by three different types of ejection mechanism which lead to the formation of three independent plasma structures [34,36,42,43]. In such a context the dynamics of fast plasma structure generated though Coulomb explosion mechanism would be described by relations (5), (7) and (8) while the dynamics of the slow structure generated through thermal ejection mechanisms are given by relations (6), (7) and (9). The reasoning behind this association is given by the fact that the nondifferentiable behavior of the laser ablation plasmas is induced through the collision process between the ejected particles in each plasma structure.…”
Section: Fractal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such differential absorption by the material and by the particle vapor, or the matrix effect [7] can strongly affect the properties of the resultant plasma (usually confined to a few mm from the sample and expanding with high velocities). The matrix effect issues are shown to be overcome by different sample preparation techniques (i.e., in the form of pressed pelletized powder [8] or, with much better results, fused glass), however these are breaking on the main advantage of LIBS-reduced time consuming sample preparation-which is lost and the operational costs are higher due to the special equipment needed. The implementation of LIBS technique on soils needs also to consider the influences of compression force, moisture, and total content of easily ionized elements on line intensities and electron density were studied and because dramatic changes occur, the recommendations were to use dry samples as much as possible and observe plasma as early it can be done in order to minimize the matrix effects on results [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%