2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of emergency assembly point for industrial accidents with AHP analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The red and yellow zones were determined as 178 and 491 m, respectively. The red zone stands for fire risk and everything closer than 178 m from the tank may burn (Hoscan and Cetinyokus, 2021). At a distance of 491 m from the tank, the concentration equals 10% of the lower explosive limit of butyl acrylate, while the concentration of butyl acrylate was 1,200 ppm.…”
Section: Death and Minor Injury Radius For Vce Of Butyl Acrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red and yellow zones were determined as 178 and 491 m, respectively. The red zone stands for fire risk and everything closer than 178 m from the tank may burn (Hoscan and Cetinyokus, 2021). At a distance of 491 m from the tank, the concentration equals 10% of the lower explosive limit of butyl acrylate, while the concentration of butyl acrylate was 1,200 ppm.…”
Section: Death and Minor Injury Radius For Vce Of Butyl Acrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of studies that investigate the pre-emergency strategies for the fire protection design (e.g., Mawhinney [9], Kironji [10], Mróz et al [11], Tomar and Khurana [12], and Rahardjo and Prihanton [13]) and the assembly point analysis (e.g., Raja Prasad and Prasad Rao [14], Unal and Uslu [15], Hoscan and Cetinyokus [16], and Şenik and Uzun [17]). For example, Kironji [10] assessed fire protection systems, such as the automatic sprinkler system, fire protection alarm, and escape route, for a commercial high-rise building.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various factors related to area size, accessibility, and capacity are examined. Hoscan and Cetinyokus [16] proposed the analytic hierarchy process-based model to examine criteria for selecting an assembly point in the event of industrial accidents. Various criteria related to mitigation strategy, coordination, transportation, and physical properties are evaluated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have discussed the evaluation index system, including qualitative methods (e.g., theoretical research, case analysis [34], and Delphi expert consultation [28]) and quantitative methods (e.g., structural equation model, interpretive structure model, decision testing, and laboratory evaluation [37][38][39]). In the existing studies on emergency capability evaluation methods, many scholars have introduced interdisciplinary knowledge, such as AHP [7,23], FCE and fuzzy clustering [40], fuzzy AHP [28], the extension rhombus thinking method [41], the entropy weight method [39], and some integration methods [18,37]. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages and provides a valuable instrument for emergency capacity evaluation.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Emergency Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to discuss SEPAs that have occurred in small towns. Third, the current evaluation models, such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [7,23,24], fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE)-AHP [25], and models based on machine learning such as AHP-Back Propagation (BP) [26], consider the linear relationship between the selected indexes but ignore the complex dynamic interactions between the elements in the SEPA evolution system. Thus, the current models weaken the validity and accuracy of index weighting and evaluation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%