2019
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Epstein-Barr Virus–Infected Lymphocyte Cell Types in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells as a Valuable Diagnostic Tool in Hematological Diseases

Abstract: Background High loads of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) can be indicative of a broad spectrum of diseases, ranging from asymptomatic infection to fatal cancers. Methods We retrospectively investigated the EBV-infected cell types in PBMCs among 291 patients. Based on EBV-infected cell types, the clinical features and prognoses of 93 patients with EBV-associated (EBV+) T/natural killer (N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because EBERs are abundantly expressed in all infected cells, regardless of the type of latency involved ( Lerner et al, 1981 ), they represent the best markers for detection of EBV presence within cells. Some laboratories have used EBV-specific PCR on sorted cells to detect and characterize circulating EBV-infected cells as an alternative to conventional histology ( Zhang et al, 2019 ), but this approach is cumbersome and may lead to false-positive findings through contamination of the T or NK cell or non–B cell fraction by either infected B cells or plasma EBV DNA, as shown herein in Fig. S4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because EBERs are abundantly expressed in all infected cells, regardless of the type of latency involved ( Lerner et al, 1981 ), they represent the best markers for detection of EBV presence within cells. Some laboratories have used EBV-specific PCR on sorted cells to detect and characterize circulating EBV-infected cells as an alternative to conventional histology ( Zhang et al, 2019 ), but this approach is cumbersome and may lead to false-positive findings through contamination of the T or NK cell or non–B cell fraction by either infected B cells or plasma EBV DNA, as shown herein in Fig. S4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who were transplanted at an early age and EBV‐naive may also contribute to high incidence 8 . Patients with non–B‐cell malignancy had a poorer prognosis than those with B‐cell‐type malignancy 9 . In our study, EBV‐DNA level was detected in T, B lymphocytes and NK cells, respectively, in five cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…8 Patients with non-B-cell malignancy had a poorer prognosis than those with B-cell-type malignancy. 9 In our suggest that a late-onset PTLD is not uncommon. 11 In our study, twothirds of the PTLD cases occurred within one year post-liver transplantation, while Burkitt lymphoma and classical Hodgkin lymphoma cases occurred later than 1.5 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…B‐cell type infection was not observed in CAEBV but was seen in immunocompromised patients including post‐transplantation states, immunosuppressive medication‐related, EBV + B‐LPDs, EBV + B‐cell lymphomas, and infectious mononucleosis in that study. As CAEBV by definition must occur in immunocompetent individuals, the findings relating B‐cell type EBV infection to immunodeficiency states and infectious mononucleosis provide additional support that this may represent a separate disease and not a phenotypic variant of CAEBV 24 …”
Section: Pathologic Features and Lineage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 93%