2007
DOI: 10.1021/jp068686q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Evaporation Rates and Vapor Pressures of Very Low Volatility Compounds:  A Study of the C4−C10 and C12 Dicarboxylic Acids

Abstract: A method for the measurement of evaporation rates and vapor pressures of low volatility compounds was developed and applied to the homologous series of C4-C10 and C12 dicarboxylic acids. Proton-transfer chemical ionization mass spectrometry was used to follow directly the temperature-dependent evaporation rates of aerosol samples collected on a cold plate that could be heated at a known rate. The vapor pressures of the deposited compounds were derived from observed evaporation rates through application of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
150
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
32
150
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best-fit H v (C * ) for the two-product model was a constant H v = 72 kJ mol −1 . These values encompass the range of H v values for individual compounds found in POA (Bilde et al 2003;Cappa et al 2007;Epstein et al 2010). For example, C * values of high molecular weight n-alkanes, which are found in diesel exhaust, range from 61.5 kJ mol −1 for n-dodecane (C * ∼ 10 6 TABLE 1 Volatility distributions and H v (C * ) for the basis set and two-product model fits presented here, and the basis set fit from Grieshop et al (2009a) Grieshop et al (2009 This study (basis set) This study (two product) µg m −3 ) (Majer and Svoboda 1985) to 80.8 kJ mol −1 for neicosane (C * ∼ 10 3 µg m −3 ) (Chirico et al 1989) and 99.3 kJ mol −1 for n-octacosane (C * ∼ 10 1 µg m −3 ) (Chirico et al 1989).…”
Section: Fits To Absorptive Partitioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best-fit H v (C * ) for the two-product model was a constant H v = 72 kJ mol −1 . These values encompass the range of H v values for individual compounds found in POA (Bilde et al 2003;Cappa et al 2007;Epstein et al 2010). For example, C * values of high molecular weight n-alkanes, which are found in diesel exhaust, range from 61.5 kJ mol −1 for n-dodecane (C * ∼ 10 6 TABLE 1 Volatility distributions and H v (C * ) for the basis set and two-product model fits presented here, and the basis set fit from Grieshop et al (2009a) Grieshop et al (2009 This study (basis set) This study (two product) µg m −3 ) (Majer and Svoboda 1985) to 80.8 kJ mol −1 for neicosane (C * ∼ 10 3 µg m −3 ) (Chirico et al 1989) and 99.3 kJ mol −1 for n-octacosane (C * ∼ 10 1 µg m −3 ) (Chirico et al 1989).…”
Section: Fits To Absorptive Partitioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Individual organic compounds found in POA have H v of 100 kJ mol −1 or higher (Bilde et al 2003;Cappa et al 2007;Epstein et al 2010). However, experimental studies of SOA report much less temperature sensitivity, with effective H v values of ∼30 kJ mol −1 (Offenburg et al 2006;Pathak et al 2007;Stanier et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the TPD aerosol-CIMS experiments were performed at relative humidities below 10 % in order to keep the contribution of water negligible (Saleh et al, 2010;Cappa et al, 2007). This was done by drying the particles using silica gel dryer after particle generation.…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Desorption Aerosol-cimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They originate from photo-oxidation of biogenic and anthropogenic compounds but there is speculation about the exact origins and formation mechanisms. These vapour pressures have been previously studied by evaporation rates in Tandem Differential Mobility Analysers (TDMA) (Tao and McMurry, 1989;Bilde et al, 2003;Bilde and Pandis, 2001), Temperature Programmed Desorption (TPD) combined with Proton Transfer Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (PT-CIMS) (Cappa et al, 2007;Chattopadhyay and Ziemann, 2005), and Knudsen mass loss effusion (Silva et al, 2001(Silva et al, , 1999 and white light resonance spectroscopy (Zardini et al, 2006) and there are discrepancies between different measurement methods of up to two orders of magnitude for some compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%