The strong morphological similitude of the block-in-matrix fabric of chaotic rock units (mélanges and broken formations) makes problematic the recognition of their primary forming-processes. We present results of the comparison between magnetic fabric and mesoscale structural investigations of non-metamorphic tectonic, sedimentary, and polygenetic mélanges in the exhumed Late Cretaceous to early Eocene Ligurian accretionary complex and overlying wedge-top basin succession in the Northern Apennines (northwest Italy). Our findings show that the magnetic fabric reveals diagnostic configurations of principal anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) axes orientation that are well comparable with the mesoscale block-in-matrix fabric of mélanges formed by different processes. Broken formations and tectonic mélanges show prolate and neutral-to-oblate ellipsoids, respectively, with magnetic fabric elements being consistent with those of the mesoscale anisotropic "structurally ordered" block-in-matrix fabric. Sedimentary mélanges show an oblate ellipsoid with a clear sedimentary magnetic fabric related to downslope gravitational emplacement. Polygenetic mélanges show the occurrence of a cumulative depositional and tectonic magnetic fabric. The comparison of field and laboratory investigations validate the analysis of magnetic features as a diagnostic tool suitable to analytically distinguish the contribution of different mélange forming-processes and their mutual superposition, and to better understand the geodynamic evolution of subduction-accretion complexes.Geosciences 2019, 9, 381 2 of 23 migrating along the basal megathrust shear zone or channeled along megasplay faults (e.g., [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]). Each mélange type may subsequently be overprinted and structurally reworked by tectonic processes, such as shearing and tectonic mixing, during the evolution of the subduction complex, particularly when placed or recycled in the plate interface and/or involved within shear zones of (mega)thrust faults and splays, forming polygenetic mélanges (e.g., [26,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]). As a consequence, the primary internal block-in-matrix fabric of mélanges is commonly obscured and strongly reworked, hampering the recognition of their primary process of formation.Although several helpful meso-to-mapscale structural criteria to distinguish chaotic rock unit types and related forming processes have been proposed and successfully applied on exhumed subduction-accretionary complexes on-land (e.g., [9,33,34,36,[38][39][40][41][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]), they cannot be fully applied to modern subduction complexes offshore because of the extremely challenging conditions of drilling in oceanic trenches that are several kilometers deep. Cores offer only a limited scale of observation, which is not comparable with that of field observations. Moreover, the size and small scale of the diagnostic block-in-matrix fabric of chaotic rock units is well below the standard seismi...