2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.196801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Formation and Ionization Energies of Charged Defects in Two-Dimensional Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5. In agreement with recent DFT studies 8, 11, 12, 16 , these results demonstrate that the task of calculating the formation energy of a charged defect in a low-dimensional material cannot be accomplished by using only DFT. A numerical scheme needs to be used to estimate Δ E L  =  E ∞  −  E L , which in the case of a singly negatively charged S vacancy in monolayer MoS 2 amounts to about 10% of the energy value obtained by DFT (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5. In agreement with recent DFT studies 8, 11, 12, 16 , these results demonstrate that the task of calculating the formation energy of a charged defect in a low-dimensional material cannot be accomplished by using only DFT. A numerical scheme needs to be used to estimate Δ E L  =  E ∞  −  E L , which in the case of a singly negatively charged S vacancy in monolayer MoS 2 amounts to about 10% of the energy value obtained by DFT (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Eq. (1), Δ E L is equal to E ∞  −  E L 1, 3, 6, 8, 9 , that is the difference in electrostatic energy between the isolated defect in the infinite material system, E ∞ , and the periodic array of defected supercells of linear dimension L compensated by a uniform charge background, E L . Here, we present a new and original method to calculate Δ E L  =  E ∞  −  E L .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exchange correlation energy was described by the generalized gradient approximation, in the scheme proposed by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) (refs 52, 53). A unit cell with vacuum region of 16 Å was used for the calculation, and a 9 × 9 × 1 Monkhorst-Pack mesh grid was used to sample the Brillouin zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, when the jellium model is used, a virtual charge is uniformly filled in the whole supercell, including the vacuum region. This leads to a divergent Coulomb interaction between the jellium charge and the charge left on the 2D slab 17 . In this case, the jellium model also becomes unphysical because the jellium is very different from the real charge distribution when electrons are excited to the band edge states with their charge distribution confined within or near the 2D slab ( Fig.1c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%