2021
DOI: 10.1515/revac-2021-0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of four parabens in cosmetics by high-performance liquid chromatography with magnetic solid-phase and ionic dispersive liquid–liquid extraction

Abstract: To determine the trace amount of four benzoic acid esters in cosmetics, ionic dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) and magnetic solid-phase extraction were combined and optimized. After solvent optimization, 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate was selected as the extraction solvent to form hydrophobic droplets in the process of ionic DLLME, followed by removal of ions from the sample solution containing Fe3O4@GO nano-materials. The magnetic nano-materials were characterized using Fourie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the performance and mechanism of the TpBD COF immobilized capillary needs to be further studied and explored to broaden its application field. To evaluate the current method, it was compared with the previously reported analytical methods [33,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. As shown in Table 7, the method in this work was found to be very rapid (baseline separation of the analytes studied within 6 min), simple (only phosphate buffer as separation media), sensitive and accurate (recovery rate 92.44-103.41%).…”
Section: Methodological Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the performance and mechanism of the TpBD COF immobilized capillary needs to be further studied and explored to broaden its application field. To evaluate the current method, it was compared with the previously reported analytical methods [33,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. As shown in Table 7, the method in this work was found to be very rapid (baseline separation of the analytes studied within 6 min), simple (only phosphate buffer as separation media), sensitive and accurate (recovery rate 92.44-103.41%).…”
Section: Methodological Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%