2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-011-9306-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Plant Extracts Through DPPH Assay: An EPR and UV–Vis Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The antioxidant activity of the fruit juices was also evaluated by DPPH according to Sanna et al (2012), with some modifications, and ABTS methods (Re et al 1999). Results were expressed as μmoles equivalents of AA/mL of juice The detailed methodologies were reported in Supplementary data (S-2.4).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Antioxidant Capacity With Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antioxidant activity of the fruit juices was also evaluated by DPPH according to Sanna et al (2012), with some modifications, and ABTS methods (Re et al 1999). Results were expressed as μmoles equivalents of AA/mL of juice The detailed methodologies were reported in Supplementary data (S-2.4).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Antioxidant Capacity With Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPPH assay for antioxidant activity, proposed more than five decades ago, is based on the ability of the antioxidant to reduce the initial concentration of the DPPH radical, a process which is associated with turning the colour of the solution from purple (colour of the DPPH radical) to yellow (colour of the corresponding hydrazine DPPH-H) (Sanna et al, 2012;Brand-Williams et al, 1995;Xie & Schaich, 2014). Although the method of antioxidant evaluation using DPPH is apparently very simple, a number of studies have highlighted the influence of various factors (pH, temperature, solvent nature the relative concentration of DPPH and antioxidants tested) on the reaction mechanism and rate between DPPH and antioxidant (Xie & Schaich, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the presence of antioxidants limits the negative effect of ROS in biological systems. On the other hand, the oxidative processes occurring in food, cosmetic or polymeric materials responsible for the degradation of these systems are often limited by the addition of synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxytoluene or butylated hydroxyanisole (Sanna et al, 2012). The extensive use of synthetic antioxidants has raised concerns about their safety, as they lead to the formation of hazardous quinones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19,20) In the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) RSA assay, in which the same sample was evaluated by using both EPR and UV-visible spectrophotometry, it was suggested that absorption by the decomposition products of the antioxidants accounts for the difference in the outcomes of the two techniques. (21) If necessary, turbid samples, which are not extracted, can be measured by the EPR based assay reported herein. In conclusion, this RSA assay employing EPR spectroscopy is highly useful for the determination of ROO • scavenging activities of colored or turbid food samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%